harrydr
04-15-2009, 06:16 PM
My situation is currently i'm employed in the Automotive industry but always living in the scare of loosing my job someday. Now my I-140 was approved June,2008 and i'm waiting for my PD to become current to file my 485.
My GC is being handled through my company's lawyer and God forbid, if i loose my job, my company will cancel my H1-B and the lawyer will revoke the I-140. This means i would need a fresh start from labor again.
I came across a friend who suggested (not in a greedy way or to earn money, he really wants to help me out) that i should check with my company and if they would let me switch my company lawyer to his company's name/lawyer and in this case if again God forbid, i loose my job, he will not cancel my H1-B and also not revoke my I-140. I wanted to ask the experts if:
1.) Is it even possible to do that and
2.) If it is possible, i'm sure my employer would report to INS that i have been laid off and my H1-B may be cancelled. In this case my I-140 won;t be valid anyways even if i switch my lawyer
3.) I would be safe only in case my company does not report this to the INS. Is this correct analogy?
My GC is being handled through my company's lawyer and God forbid, if i loose my job, my company will cancel my H1-B and the lawyer will revoke the I-140. This means i would need a fresh start from labor again.
I came across a friend who suggested (not in a greedy way or to earn money, he really wants to help me out) that i should check with my company and if they would let me switch my company lawyer to his company's name/lawyer and in this case if again God forbid, i loose my job, he will not cancel my H1-B and also not revoke my I-140. I wanted to ask the experts if:
1.) Is it even possible to do that and
2.) If it is possible, i'm sure my employer would report to INS that i have been laid off and my H1-B may be cancelled. In this case my I-140 won;t be valid anyways even if i switch my lawyer
3.) I would be safe only in case my company does not report this to the INS. Is this correct analogy?