PDA

View Full Version : how to prove I-140 ability to pay, Company in Loss,Paid partially profered wage


sts_seeker
06-04-2007, 05:42 PM
Dear Experts I need this suggestion ASAP to prove I-140 ability to pay.

My Priority Date EB3 is Apr, 2004 and Company is in Loss for '04,'05 and '06 and so can't prove Net assets is greater than liablities or revenue is greater than proffered wage. However Company recently has been approved for line of credit which is greater than(>) the proferred wage.

The only way to show the ablity to pay is by showing the w2 that I have been paid the proffered wage since the priority date which is April 04. But I did not work from Jan'04 though mid of '05 because of health reason. During that time, I was paid by the disability insurance from the employer and I paid the tax for disability income while filing the W-2.
After I joined back on mid on '05 I have been paid more than proferred wage till present(June'07).

Does that satisfy the USCIS of the requirement of ability to pay or Not???

I need help ASAP.
Thanks everyone

okuzmin
06-04-2007, 08:16 PM
I had a similar situation, and I had to change the employer and start all over again. However, your situation looks much better than mine. I was trying to find a lender to vouch for my employer, but that didn't happen. Your employer, on the other hand, has the lender. I believe you should be fine. The only area I'm not sure about is the period of time you didn't work for the health reason. This one I would consult about with a lawyer, since you are supposed to be employed while on H1b, or else you're out of status. There may be certain exceptions (like health-related issues) in the law.

satishku_2000
06-04-2007, 08:26 PM
I got the same kind of RFE , but the wage paid to me is much more than the proferred wage all along . But USCIS wants my company to prove that they have the ability to pay all the pending 140s .. Do you guys think I am Safe?

pappu
06-04-2007, 10:32 PM
Could you please search archives. In the past I had written about these issues and members had discussed this issue.