|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
| IV Agenda and Legislative Updates Immigration Voice's Agenda and Legislative Updates |
Donation Goal
|
|||||
| Goal amount for this month: 10000 USD, Received: 0 USD (0%) |
|
Donate Now | |||
| Please contribute to Immigration Voice. | |||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Yes I agree its a combination of
1) FY2009 spillover that has shortened the 2004 EB2 numbers 2) Less anticipated demand from EB2 ROW due to bad economy 3) USCIS is now in a better position to predict since they have finally processes majority of July 2007 applications to accurately determine the demand. 4) Better co-ordination between USCIS & Department of State 5) Better co-ordination within USCIS itself. Till 2008 USCIS had no clue about demand & Supply so they would have business as usual till last quarter and then if they found that there were large number of visa that were unused they would push the dates forward by 1 -2 years in order to consume them. After they went into Oct and realized there were large pending applications they would pull the dates back by 4 years so that no one calls and bothers them. But now with preadjudication they have a clear idea of how many approvable cases are piled up so there is better clarity and hope that visa bulletien will be more predictable. But then we are dealing with USCIS so anything is possible. Last edited by eb2_mumbai; 09-28-2009 at 11:23 AM. |
|
||||
|
How can we work with DOS to make Quarterly Spillover happen.
There have been questions raised regarding the way numbers have been provided to the China and India in the Employment Second preference categories beginning in April. Section 202(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act states that if total demand for visas in an Employment preference category is insufficient to use all available visa numbers in that category in a calendar quarter, then the unused numbers may be made available without regard to the annual per-country limit. (For example: If the second preference annual limit were 40,000, number use by “All Other Countries” were estimated to be only 25,000, and the China/India combined number use based on their per-country limits were 6,000, then there would be 9,000 numbers unused. Those 9,000 numbers could then be made available to China and India applicants without regard to their per-country limits.) Source : Visa Bulletin for July 2008 If we workout a plan for this and make it happen, I am happy. Here are some good points 1. USCIS work load will be streamlined all the FY and avoid huge activity/workload in Sept 10. 2. If economy / job market continues like this, EB3I can see light not to mention the advantage to EB2I. |
|
||||
|
We should make sure that DOS releases future Visa Bulletins with Quarterly spill over in mind. This way many of us don't have to wait the whole year.
In my humble opinion, posting the wait number in GC queue based on USCIS and IV (FOIA) data would not achieve anything. If there is a chance that EB1 and EBROW demand would be very less in this year, we should try to get quarterly spill-over visas. Is there a way to open a communication channel with DOS's Visa Office ? Any guidance from IV ?
__________________
Contributed to Flower campaign Contributed to DC Rally fund Tri-State Chapter member |
|
||||
|
Thats a good find. I was searching for the quarterly spillover reference myself.Since its the law, it would actually be illegal if the DOS did not follow this rule. Anything we can do to remind DOS that they need to do this? This need not be a long drawn out battle-all we are asking them to do is implement the law. Maybe we can ask AILA to help us in this??
Quote:
Last edited by seeking_GC; 09-28-2009 at 02:07 PM. Reason: . |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Check here. Based on FOIA data released to IV by USCIS http://immigrationvoice.org/tracker/waitimesUSCIS1.php Based on data available on the USCIS website http://immigrationvoice.org/tracker/waitimesUSCIS2.php
__________________
I485/EAD/AP - Reached NSC on 2 July, 2007. Got RN on 09/12 and FP on 9/24 from NSC. EAD cards on 9/24. To keep a lamp burning, we have to keep putting oil in it - Mother Teresa. |
|
||||
|
Your position is 3278 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Dec-03" and Category "EB3" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Sep, 2010. Your position is 22542 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Dec-03" and Category "EB3" . Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Oct, 2017.
__________________
PD-12/2003,EB2-India I-140 approved-NSC I-485 filed on 07/05/07; receipt notices received on 08/20. I-485 approved on 04/06/10 EAD and AP-- filed on 08/15/07 AP--Approved on 11/20;received on 11/26/07 Contributed--$100 so far Attended San Jose rally and DC rally. |
|
||||
|
Estimated Wait time
Result for nrk: Your position is 23184 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Apr-06" and Category "EB2" . Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Dec, 2017. Estimated wait time Employment based gree card Result for nrk: Your position is 5450 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Apr-06" and Category "EB2" . Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Aug, 2011. Above data shows some 6 years difference |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Use these URL's
Based on FOIA data released to IV by USCIS http://immigrationvoice.org/tracker/waitimesUSCIS1.php Based on data available on the USCIS website http://immigrationvoice.org/tracker/waitimesUSCIS2.php |
|
||||
|
I think this tool is just based on estimates assuming a perfect system with no RFE etc. and strictly FIFO. This is as good as anyones guess but with the total no of inputs from the data. It can tell you probably how many are ahead of u but not not the date u will get. I got my GC (I had 2 sets of RFES as well) but acording to this I wil get in 2011.
So this is just fun and nothing more, I thought that the wait list was released by USCIS and was more practical than mathematical. |
|
||||
|
(*based on data from USCIS)
Result for murbh: Your position is 163 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "", Priority Date "Mar-05" and Category "EB2" . Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Sep, 2009. (*based on data from USCIS website September 2009) Result for murbh: Your position is 596 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "", Priority Date "Mar-05" and Category "EB2" . Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Sep, 2009. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| EB2/EB3 slow forward movement ahead in 2009 | mpadapa | Retrogression, priority dates and Visa bulletins | 41 | 02-14-2009 12:32 PM |
| EB2 India fwd movement: Possible Reason | smartboy75 | Retrogression, priority dates and Visa bulletins | 90 | 07-14-2008 09:17 AM |
| is this the reason for retrogression for EB- India? | makino_a55 | Retrogression, priority dates and Visa bulletins | 12 | 08-22-2006 10:05 AM |
| LinkBack |
LinkBack URL |
About LinkBacks |