|
|||||||
| Retrogression, priority dates and Visa bulletins Issues surrounding the retrogression of the priority dates for the various employment based categories |
Donation Goal
|
|||||
| Goal amount for this month: 10000 USD, Received: 0 USD (0%) |
|
Donate Now | |||
| Please contribute to Immigration Voice. | |||||
Legend:
Active Tags
Preferred Tags
Tag Cloud (Top 70 Tags)
|
| 140 140 approved 221g 485 485 rfe ac21 advance parole aos birth certificate canada change of status cir cos denial denied divorce ead eb2 eb3 economy extension f-1 f1 visa foia greencard green card h-1b h1 to h4 h1 transfer h1 visa h1-b h1b h1b extension h1b stamping h1b transfer h4 visa i-94 i-140 i-140 approved i-485 i-485 rfe i94 i140 i485 i797 immigration india job change l1 visa labor layoff lca marriage obama opt out of status perm porting port of entry priority date renewal rfe stamping transfer travel uscis visa visa stamping visitor visa wake up |
| Tags |
None
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
anti-EB reform people look at these bills and in order to find out the status...post messages in IV and then decide on strategy of whether to call lawmakers.
__________________
G Guy from above the 49th parallel |
|
||||
|
I also called the number 202-224-7703. The lady told me that, it is scheduled for hearing this fall and we can check on Website judiciary.senate.gov . She said, usually they post the date, 1 week before the hearing in the committee. She is also told that, she is going to pass on the message for hearing, to the senators.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
This bill was introduced last congress too...nothing happened. Don't get yr hopes up too high. |
|
||||
|
Bills like this are discussed every time, they come and go, year over year.
Any new bill introduced is asked simple question against it by antis and anti-favored-lobbysts - is it going to give any help for China, India, Mexico, Philipines to start with and all the world except western europe? If they find even a small thing (which they term conveniently as a "loophole"), then lobbysts suggest simple amendments, or keep delaying the hearing under the disguise of "constructive changes" simply to make sure that above stated stuff doesn't happen. sorry for being blunt. but looks like that's a reality. They oppose any "rationing" of healthcare but support "rationing" of highly-skilled workers as per their "country of origin". What a hipocracy! |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| vote "Yes" for bill S.1085 | psaxena | Interesting Topics | 131 | 06-11-2009 01:46 AM |
| Tracking S.1085: VISA recapture bill | BPforGC | Retrogression, priority dates and Visa bulletins | 53 | 06-03-2009 03:57 PM |
| ACTION ITEM: For Bill S. 1085 | realizeit | Action Items for everyone | 3 | 06-02-2009 01:00 PM |
| LinkBack |
LinkBack URL |
About LinkBacks |