|
|||||||
| Retrogression, priority dates and Visa bulletins Issues surrounding the retrogression of the priority dates for the various employment based categories |
advertisement
Donation Goal
|
||||
| Goal amount for this month: 10000 USD, Received: 1340 USD (13%) |
|
Donate Now | ||
| Please contribute to Immigration Voice. | ||||
|
Legend:
Active Tags
Preferred Tags
Tag Cloud (Top 70 Tags)
|
| 140 140 approved 221g 401k 485 485 denied 485 rfe ac21 ac 21 advance parole aos birth certificate canada cir citizenship cos denial denied divorce ead eb2 eb3 economy extension f-1 f1 visa foia grassley green card greencard h-1b h1 to h4 h1 visa h1-b h1b h1b extension h1b to h4 h1b transfer i-94 i-131 i-140 i-140 approved i-485 i-485 rfe i94 i140 i485 immigration india job change labor layoff lca marriage opt out of status passport perm priority date renewal rfe stamping status tax transfer travel uscis visa visitor visa wake up |
| Tags |
| None |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-11-2009, 12:06 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Its all a big mystery
Either it is all a big mystery or a conspiracy. I agree with you that there can't be so many people from EB3-ROW from 2002 still waiting for their GC . Same with India and China. They are still sitting at 1st May 2001. I wonder how many people filed in 2001 that even after 10 years USCIS is still processing their cases.
There is something going on behind the scenes and breaking ( or bending of the rules ). They could easily have prevented visa wastage all these years so the backlog could be reduced but do they ? Who's preventing them from using up all the visas and doing what is best for the applicants .
__________________
Contributed 200 $ towards IV ** Could it be  **EB3 - India - PD - Sep 2004 I140/485 AP - 08/02/2007 FP - 11/2007 AP/EAD - 11/2007 
|
|
11-11-2009, 12:56 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Almond, even i used to think "so close and yet so far". but now have understood, i was never close to begin with...
 it is better to accept the reality than trying to live with fool's gold like i did for about 2-3 years... Quote:
__________________
********************************************* Proud member of TRISTATE IV CHAPTER ( NJ / NY / CT ) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/immigrationvoiceny/ *********************************************
|
|
11-11-2009, 06:29 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Quote:
|
advertisement
|
11-11-2009, 09:36 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi,
Looking at the number of 485s pending for ROW EB3 with PD of years 2001 and 2002, I do not quite understand why the dates have not moved. We need to ask this question to someone. It does not make any sense.
__________________
Glus  The above is my opinion. I am not an attorney and this is not a legal advise. Seek a legal advise from a qualified attorney. Attended 9/18 rally
|
|
11-11-2009, 10:57 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Same with here EB3-I 2001..(waiting continues)
So close and yet so far...really they are creating nightmare ..
|
|
11-12-2009, 10:25 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
who to ask
The question is who has the answer, other than the people at uscis that dont want us to know?
I dont understand any of the EB3 not moving it is the beginning of the fiscal year, they should be moving forward not be stuck.... Are we going to have another July 2007 fiasco?
|
|
11-12-2009, 11:16 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DOS has the answer
Hi,
I think that DOS, the visa office has the answer. This is insane. According to the 485 report released by USCIS some time ago, there were approximately 4000 ROW EB3 pending cases up with PD of up to 6/2002. As such, the dates should have been moved in December and moved a lot. Yet, they did not move it. I think I am going to write up a letter to Mr. Opperheim, or whatever his name is and ask why he did not move the dates at all.
__________________
Glus The above is my opinion. I am not an attorney and this is not a legal advise. Seek a legal advise from a qualified attorney. Attended 9/18 rally
|
|
11-12-2009, 11:23 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Letter it is
Sounds liek a great idea, I am right there with you, because this just makes no sense.
|
advertisement
|
11-12-2009, 11:33 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi,
I just asked my attorney if she had a direct contact with Mr. Opperheim, the person responsible for VB. If she does respond, I will provide the address / email here. I am writing to them. It does not make any sense. My opinion is that they are giving USCIS a December brake now. If the 485 report released by USCIS is true and reliable, the RoW dates for Dec should have been moved to mid or end of 2003 now.
__________________
Glus The above is my opinion. I am not an attorney and this is not a legal advise. Seek a legal advise from a qualified attorney. Attended 9/18 rally
|
|
11-12-2009, 01:10 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Auf gut deutsch, wir kannst auf granit beissen
Quote:
|
|
11-12-2009, 07:47 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
granit hmmm
So for the non german speaking, we are simply biting on granite...oh well I lost my teeth doing that for the last 6 years...so I guess I keep biting ;-)
|
|
11-13-2009, 10:26 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
numbers
so in August there were 3999 waiting in 2001, 2075 in 2002, 4769 in 2003 and 6370 in 2004 then in 2005 its 14 678.....
so really we should be in 2003 by now............
|
|
11-13-2009, 12:22 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
response from DOS
Hi,
I emailed DOS yesterday and asked why EB3 ROW did not move. This morning I received a response: Dear Mr. XXXXX: The E3 cut-off date has not moved because USCIS has already requested nearly as many E3 numbers as may be allocated for the first quarter, and there are no unused E1 and E2 numbers to fall down to E3. The data which CIS posted can be misleading because it was probably a month old when it was published, it does not take into account demand at our overseas posts, that being processed at CIS District Offices, etc. The INA imposes limits on the amount of visa numbers which may be used in each of the first three quarters, and without moving most of the Employment cut-off dates we are approaching the first quarter limit. LMH Legal Net Visa Office Department of State
__________________
Glus The above is my opinion. I am not an attorney and this is not a legal advise. Seek a legal advise from a qualified attorney. Attended 9/18 rally
|
|
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
advertisement
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Non Co-operation Movement | cvrnr | Action Items for everyone | 19 | 07-29-2008 08:04 PM |
| Further movement in PD in April VB for Ind/Chi? | iv_only_hope | Retrogression, priority dates and Visa bulletins | 20 | 02-20-2008 04:04 PM |
| PD movement prediction | aristotle | Retrogression, priority dates and Visa bulletins | 89 | 02-12-2007 09:13 PM |
| Some movement on CIR in House!! | god_bless_you | IV Agenda and Legislative Updates | 6 | 06-21-2006 09:46 AM |
advertisement
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 PM.
