Immigration Voice - Forums

Go Back   Immigration Voice > Immigration Voice Issues and Congressional updates > All other Green Card Issues
All other Green Card Issues I-140/I-485, Family Based Green Card

advertisement
 

Donation Goal
Goal amount for this month: 10000 USD, Received: 1340 USD (13%)
Donate Now
Please contribute to Immigration Voice.

Legend:   Active Tags   Preferred Tags   
Tag Cloud   (Top 70 Tags)
140 140 approved 221g 401k 485 485 denied 485 rfe ac21 ac 21 advance parole aos birth certificate canada cir citizenship cos denial denied divorce ead eb2 eb3 economy extension f-1 f1 visa foia grassley green card greencard h-1b h1 to h4 h1 visa h1-b h1b h1b extension h1b to h4 h1b transfer i-94 i-131 i-140 i-140 approved i-485 i-485 rfe i94 i140 i485 immigration india job change labor layoff lca marriage opt out of status passport perm priority date renewal rfe stamping status tax transfer travel uscis visa visitor visa wake up

Tags
ead , unemployment
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:04 AM
Banned
Priority Date
:
Apr-04
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
12/30/2005
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140
I485 Mailed Date
:
12/30/2005
Compare
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 28
greatguy will become famous soon enough
Default Unemployment benefits on EAD

Can an EAD holder claim government unemployment benefits ? what is the downside risk ? what paperwork is needed ?
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:08 AM
Member
Priority Date
:
Apr-04
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
12/12/2007
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
02/01/2007
Compare
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 93
dollar500 is infamous around these parts dollar500 is infamous around these parts
Default Surprisingly yes!!!

But there are several buts...

1. It depends on city and state regulations. In fact my city offers unemployment benefits to even visa holders. (although technically that's not possible)

2. I have heard that it's considered a negative on your H1b application as you have been a liability to the country. Although I am not sure about this clause.

Hope this helps
__________________
------------------
Member PA chapter
Sent flowers during flowers campaign.
Donated $100 in past
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:51 AM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Jan-06
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
07/16/2007
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/25/2007
Compare
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 108
easygoer has much to be proud of easygoer has much to be proud of easygoer has much to be proud of easygoer has much to be proud of easygoer has much to be proud of easygoer has much to be proud of easygoer has much to be proud of easygoer has much to be proud of easygoer has much to be proud of
Default Your greencard may get rejected

Your greencard filed on the presumption that company want to employ you on a permanent basis and it has enough resources for the same. When you claim unemployment then it proves that comapany does not have enough work to prove her claim for your permanent employment.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:54 AM
Member
Priority Date
:
Apr-06
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
09/09/2006
Chargeability
:
Italy
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/02/2007
Compare
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 34
kicca will become famous soon enough
Default this is for MISSOURI

"Legal Victory for working immigrants in Missouri

This entry was posted on 9/15/2007 9:34 AM and here is the link:
http://blog.us-legalsolutions.com/20...-missouri.aspx

US Legal Solutions and Ken Schmitt scored a major victory for working immigrants in Missouri caught in the nightmare of US Immigration Service's (USCIS) processing delays. Many immigrants lawfully employed in the United States face the necessity of re-applying or extending their status every few years or more frequently. The dismaying delays by USCIS in processing these applications often mean that the worker (and their employer) must wait weeks or months after the expiration date of the immigrant's current employment authorization to receive their new Employment Authorization Document (EAD) -- even when the immigrant applies months in advance of the current EAD's expiration date. Meanwhile, the Department of Labor represents a constant threat of employer raids and audits of the employer's documentation for each employee's employment authorization leading many employers to terminate the lawful immigrant's employment once the existing EAD expires while the immigrant is waiting for their new EAD. When the immigrant then applies for the unemployment benefits to which they are entitled, many employers are tempted to object to the payment of benefits arguing that the immigrant employee is at fault for failing to timely present a renewed EAD. Missouri has now flatly rejected this argument and has determined that the terminated employee is entitled to benefits."

online there is a summary of the case and the complete opinion of the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.
__________________
http://groups.google.com/group/ivmo
MISSOURI CHAPTER MEMBER
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 02:38 PM
Member
Priority Date
:
Dec-01
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
07/11/2005
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
06/10/2007
Compare
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 60
H1Girl is a name known to all H1Girl is a name known to all H1Girl is a name known to all H1Girl is a name known to all H1Girl is a name known to all H1Girl is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by easygoer View Post
Your greencard filed on the presumption that company want to employ you on a permanent basis and it has enough resources for the same. When you claim unemployment then it proves that comapany does not have enough work to prove her claim for your permanent employment.
What about derivative applicants? Meaning, spouses who were working on EAD and then lost the employment...
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


advertisement
 
 
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 03:16 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Dec-05
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
11/20/2008
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 393
pointlesswait is infamous around these parts
Default EAD will not qualify!!!

unemployment is only for citizens...
i dont think we qualify!!!
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 03:22 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
N/A
Category
:
N/A
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Afghanistan
Processing Stage
:
N/A
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 500
Munna Bhai is infamous around these parts Munna Bhai is infamous around these parts Munna Bhai is infamous around these parts Munna Bhai is infamous around these parts Munna Bhai is infamous around these parts Munna Bhai is infamous around these parts Munna Bhai is infamous around these parts Munna Bhai is infamous around these parts Munna Bhai is infamous around these parts Munna Bhai is infamous around these parts Munna Bhai is infamous around these parts
Default who said??

Quote:
Originally Posted by pointlesswait View Post
unemployment is only for citizens...
i dont think we qualify!!!
EAD qualifies for unemployment benefits. Read the rules of the game.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 03:42 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Sep-04
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
06/20/2007
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
08/07/2007
Compare
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 395
ashkam has much to be proud of ashkam has much to be proud of ashkam has much to be proud of ashkam has much to be proud of ashkam has much to be proud of ashkam has much to be proud of ashkam has much to be proud of ashkam has much to be proud of ashkam has much to be proud of ashkam has much to be proud of
Default

"To be eligible for unemployment insurance, immigrant workers must satisfy the same basic requirements as other workers. First, they must be unemployed “through no fault of their own.” Second, they must have enough wages earned or hours worked to establish a claim. Third, they must be able and available to work, and they must be looking for, and not refuse, “suitable” work."

Here's the link.
__________________
PD Sep 2004 EB3 RIR
LC approved Jan 2007
I-140 approved June 2007
I-485 delivered to NSC 8 August 2007
Receipted at TSC 2 October 2007
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 03:50 PM
Administrator
Priority Date
:
Sep-04
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
09/01/2005
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/24/2007
Compare
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,498
logiclife has a reputation beyond repute logiclife has a reputation beyond repute logiclife has a reputation beyond repute logiclife has a reputation beyond repute logiclife has a reputation beyond repute logiclife has a reputation beyond repute logiclife has a reputation beyond repute logiclife has a reputation beyond repute logiclife has a reputation beyond repute logiclife has a reputation beyond repute logiclife has a reputation beyond repute
Default Dont

Dont claim unemployment.

1. On one hand, you claim to have a job offer from an employer - which is the basis for your green card petition. The future job.
2. Also, you have work authorization in form of EAD or H1/L1.
3. Now, you are claiming unemployment, essentially stating that you are "looking for" a job.

Do those three things add up?

Now even if its possible to claim unemployment on EAD, if USCIS finds that out, your 485 will be in serious jeopardy and surely invite an RFE into your job offer and ask your employer if the job offer is still valid and ask you to find another employer willing to offer job and produce an employment verification letter. What will you do then?

Also, to get unemployment, you have to show that you are "Looking for" work. Basically, you are hunting for jobs. Now if you are saying that you are looking for jobs, then that is in direct contradiction to what your claim is for 485 - that you are not "still looking" for jobs, but you already have a job offer that you plan to accept upon getting GC.

So to combine to 2, are you going to say to USCIS in response to RFE that your job offer is something you are going to accept AFTER getting GC and until then, you want another job - which you dont have and are "still looking for" and hence the claim for unemployment?
__________________
--------------------------------------------------
Status : I-485 pending, PD Nov 2004, EB3 - India.
--------------------------------------------------
Religion is an insult to human dignity. Without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
- Steven Weinberg, Nobel Prize winning physicist.
--------------------------------------------------

Last edited by logiclife; 12-20-2007 at 03:54 PM.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 04:25 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Feb-07
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
08/10/2007
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
08/19/2007
Compare
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 191
mrdelhiite has a spectacular aura about mrdelhiite has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by logiclife View Post
Dont claim unemployment.

1. On one hand, you claim to have a job offer from an employer - which is the basis for your green card petition. The future job.
2. Also, you have work authorization in form of EAD or H1/L1.
3. Now, you are claiming unemployment, essentially stating that you are "looking for" a job.

Do those three things add up?

Now even if its possible to claim unemployment on EAD, if USCIS finds that out, your 485 will be in serious jeopardy and surely invite an RFE into your job offer and ask your employer if the job offer is still valid and ask you to find another employer willing to offer job and produce an employment verification letter. What will you do then?

Also, to get unemployment, you have to show that you are "Looking for" work. Basically, you are hunting for jobs. Now if you are saying that you are looking for jobs, then that is in direct contradiction to what your claim is for 485 - that you are not "still looking" for jobs, but you already have a job offer that you plan to accept upon getting GC.

So to combine to 2, are you going to say to USCIS in response to RFE that your job offer is something you are going to accept AFTER getting GC and until then, you want another job - which you dont have and are "still looking for" and hence the claim for unemployment?


For primary applicant what you said makes perfect sense .. but as was asked earlier what about dependent ... although i strongly feel for few $$ it is not worth adding additional complication to your green card case anyway ..
-M
__________________
contributed $100 so far more to come

I WAS THERE IN DC, WERE YOU?
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


advertisement
 
 
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 05:22 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Jun-03
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,439
eb3_nepa has a reputation beyond repute eb3_nepa has a reputation beyond repute eb3_nepa has a reputation beyond repute eb3_nepa has a reputation beyond repute eb3_nepa has a reputation beyond repute eb3_nepa has a reputation beyond repute eb3_nepa has a reputation beyond repute eb3_nepa has a reputation beyond repute eb3_nepa has a reputation beyond repute eb3_nepa has a reputation beyond repute eb3_nepa has a reputation beyond repute
Default Pushing the envelope

I think now people are beginning to Majorly push the envelope.

Are you not supposed to be OUT OF STATUS if you are on an EAD but without a job? I thought that if you changed jobs using an EAD, you were supposed to have a similar kind of JOB. Now does NO JOB = Same kind of Job?
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 07:00 PM
Donor
Priority Date
:
Nov-04
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
05/05/2007
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/01/2007
Compare
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 502
bigboy007 has much to be proud of bigboy007 has much to be proud of bigboy007 has much to be proud of bigboy007 has much to be proud of bigboy007 has much to be proud of bigboy007 has much to be proud of bigboy007 has much to be proud of bigboy007 has much to be proud of bigboy007 has much to be proud of
Default

I think hez talking about dependent EAD , status issue doesnt arise for dependents right , i dont about the answer dude but question seems logical for dependent side . Ofcourse primary should never do that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by eb3_nepa View Post
I think now people are beginning to Majorly push the envelope.

Are you not supposed to be OUT OF STATUS if you are on an EAD but without a job? I thought that if you changed jobs using an EAD, you were supposed to have a similar kind of JOB. Now does NO JOB = Same kind of Job?
__________________
** I am only providing info that I am thinking which might not be correct always **
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 03:05 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
May-04
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
04/30/2007
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/23/2007
Compare
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 159
immigrationvoice1 will become famous soon enough immigrationvoice1 will become famous soon enough
Default Update...

I just called Virginia Employment Commission's Fairfax, VA office at 703-803-0000 to find out whether people on H1B or EAD are eligible to file for unemployment benefits.

The person who picked up the phone said " as long as you have ANY valid work authorization in the US like a Green Card or H2B etc, you are eligible to file for unemployment benefits"

The following chat transcript from attorney Murthy's website are also on similar lines:

Chat User :Will my GC case (for future job, only I-485 pending) be affected if I have received unemployment benefits in the past? EAD validity for this was verified by EDD/USCIS.

Attorney Murthy :Generally, a person who receives unemployment benefits should not be affected, as that is not considered a government-paid subsidy. It is paid out of employer funds for their
employees who lose their jobs, etc.

The above is available at:

http://www.murthy.com/chatlogs/ch052206_P.html

Requesting more information from IV members and if they can call their state's employment commission and their attorneys to find out more on this topic. It may help a lot of people in this forum who are between jobs.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 03:14 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
May-04
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
04/30/2007
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/23/2007
Compare
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 159
immigrationvoice1 will become famous soon enough immigrationvoice1 will become famous soon enough
Default bump

bump
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 03:18 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Apr-04
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
11/11/1999
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
11/11/1999
Compare
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 233
zCool has much to be proud of zCool has much to be proud of zCool has much to be proud of zCool has much to be proud of zCool has much to be proud of zCool has much to be proud of zCool has much to be proud of zCool has much to be proud of
Default

I don't think they will find that out without looking at either your tax documents or you disclosign it in an interview.
Take that ONLY IF it's the last resort. It can only harm if IO finds out you've been on the UI during the period of EAD.
There's legality and then there's practicality..
Legally Ms. Murthy might be right..
Practically I can't imagine this not creating doubts related to becoming "Public Charge"
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


Reply

Bookmarks

advertisement
 

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


advertisement

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c)ImmigrationVoice.org