|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
| Action Items for everyone Webfaxes, phone campaigns and other directives from core group. |
Donation Goal
|
|||||
| Goal amount for this month: 10000 USD, Received: 0 USD (0%) |
|
Donate Now | |||
| Please contribute to Immigration Voice. | |||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
You are on the money my friend.
This should takes precedence over everything else. Quote:
__________________
------------------------------------- hopefulgc EB2 Apr 2004 Approved on 9/9/9 ![]() FL chapter: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FL_Immigration_Voice $100 through Google Order, Plus supported almost all campaigns big and small -:- from one great country to another ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ If my post has been helpful, please consider contributing to immigrationvoiceThank you. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ |
|
||||
|
I have mentioned the same thing in couple of other threads...
I reiterate --- We need a immediate, thorough, persistent, high profile effort from IV community to get just two things ONE ---- The numbers of pending I-485 cases in all categories (and possibly year wise break down of numbers). Whether using FOI act or requesting via Ombudsman or file lawsuit or whatever it takes TWO ----- Requesting USCIS to make public just two bits of information every month. The range of PDs (the oldest and the latest PD) in each category (EB1, EB2, EB3 etc) among the approved cases in a given month. The first one is the single most important piece of information that can do miracles potentially...... The second one would be icing on the cake... Why should IV community make this top priority - We are not asking USCIS/DOS/Congress to change any laws. Which means - We don't have to lobby hard- The information we are asking is already available to them and its not too hard to compile..since all data is computerized - They can't claim they don't have these numbers, since this is the most basic (among other info) info they would have to provide to DOS to set PDs etc... - The law (FOI) is already in place and on our side. And the process is straight forward as well. - By having this data made public, would automatically - Drive transparency and accountability
__________________
PD - May 2001 EB3 - I I-485 - RD - 2007 July 30, Nebraska. EAD - APPROVED - 2007 Oct FP - 2007 Sep AP - 2007 Dec FBI Namecheck -- ?? (How to find out?) FP -- Cleared ?? (How to find out?) Last edited by optimystic; 09-28-2008 at 11:17 PM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I sincerely request IV core/admins to comment on this and tell us - What are the reasons/impediments that prevent us from pursuing this - What would they need from the IV community to make this happen. No disrespect but I hope we get some more details than 'Get in touch with your local state chapters'
__________________
PD - May 2001 EB3 - I I-485 - RD - 2007 July 30, Nebraska. EAD - APPROVED - 2007 Oct FP - 2007 Sep AP - 2007 Dec FBI Namecheck -- ?? (How to find out?) FP -- Cleared ?? (How to find out?) Last edited by optimystic; 09-28-2008 at 12:58 AM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Can we not focus on this first? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() I mentioned couple of reasons how this data/statistics is going to help us in my post above. The biggest problem I currently see is that USCIS operations are shrouded in secrecy....Hence there is no accountability or pressure or incentive to process cases fairly in priority order... Even if we can get some laws passed like Visa recapture....what if USCIS continues to work at snail's pace and continue to process cases out of order.... You can't even blame them any more for Visa number wastage since there will be plenty of visas after recapture and they will respond back "Hey there's no more wastage now, why are you worrried...you will get your GC eventually! " "Or we are short handed , we can't go any faster than this" So how to force them to work efficiently and process more cases....I see only one Way ---Transparency...if everyone knows how many 2001/2002 cases are rotting in their warehouses while they for no reason play sea-saw with PDs and Processing dates, then there might be some pressure...Hell it might even motivate dormant members of this community to take up arms (placards ! ) and fight (rally ! ) for the cause. AILA etc may be able to support us openly... I mean this is a very low hanging fruit as opposed to other drives that are being proposed (law changes to allow house buyers to get GC faster, Removal of Country quotas etc).....but the potential for benefit may be huge....Unless I am totally missing some thing here...Hence the request for comments from experienced people from IV core...
__________________
PD - May 2001 EB3 - I I-485 - RD - 2007 July 30, Nebraska. EAD - APPROVED - 2007 Oct FP - 2007 Sep AP - 2007 Dec FBI Namecheck -- ?? (How to find out?) FP -- Cleared ?? (How to find out?) |
|
||||
|
Can atleast one person from IV core help us out with this so that people on the sidelines can start joining in and supporting this. We can totalyl use the support.
we gotta get this going. Quote:
__________________
------------------------------------- hopefulgc EB2 Apr 2004 Approved on 9/9/9 ![]() FL chapter: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FL_Immigration_Voice $100 through Google Order, Plus supported almost all campaigns big and small -:- from one great country to another ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ If my post has been helpful, please consider contributing to immigrationvoiceThank you. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ |
|
||||
|
Got a red dot with a comment "." !
To the commenter: I don't care about red dot or green dot. But I do care about what you think or want to say, as long as it is a reasonable argument. And I often would prefer it as a open response rather than a hidden comment. A healthy open debate is a necessary process to arrive at a consensus direction. But when you give me nothing but a "." as your response, I don't know what we can debate about it! I wonder what do you even get by just giving red for my point of view but not saying what your point of view is ! That is not just weak but a NULL argument ! I do appreciate though for not using some foul language in the comment Reasonable arguments are always welcome. Please do let us know why you disagree.
__________________
PD - May 2001 EB3 - I I-485 - RD - 2007 July 30, Nebraska. EAD - APPROVED - 2007 Oct FP - 2007 Sep AP - 2007 Dec FBI Namecheck -- ?? (How to find out?) FP -- Cleared ?? (How to find out?) |
|
||||
|
Look, either you care about the red/green dot or you don't. It can't be both at the same time. And if you don't care about the red dots or the comments, then why did you dedicate an entire post to red dot. It must have taken you at least 10 minutes to read the comments, think about a response and then draft your response of 10 lines. It makes me sick when someone says that I don't care about the red dots and argues against the red dot/-ve remark or the type/manner of -ve remark. I mean, such post speaks loud and clear that you are very very very mindful of your reputation on the unanimous forum on which your reputation is decided by other unanimous members, without you knowing who those unanimous members are. Why argue with that unanimous member who gave you -ve reputation if you don't care. I see at least 3-4 such posts every day and couldn't stop myself from posting my views about such posts. If you don't care about red/green dots, why even check to see if you got red or green dot?
Quote:
__________________
"The whole history of these books is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills." - One Great man to another, 1814 |
|
||||
|
Quote:
- I thought I made it clear that I cared about the view point/comment (or the absence there of) than the dot itself - unanimous ---- I think you mean anonymous - I don't claim that I am totally oblivious to reputation points....they do have some purpose...they obviously have some weight (people pay attention to your view points based on perceived reputation) otherwise IV core would not have made that a requirement to participate in chat. But I am not obsessive about the points either. - I look at the reputation comments to see what people are thinking about my view point & who agree/disagree with me (some people put their handles in comments so you know who agree with your view point) so I can clarify my views better if I can - I took me only 5 min to go thru comments and write that post. - I would have rather preferred you commented a line or two about the topic of this thread than 13 lines you used up commenting on trivial stuff. (I am guilty of doing the same, now that I responded to your post )-Some times I find any excuse I can to post a response to stealthily bump up the topic I am interested in to the top rather than blatantly "^^BUMP^^" ing - I hope I responded to all your points (I know from some other posts of yours that you are stickler for getting responses to all points you made) Now I hope you rather made some comments on the topic in question than this response
__________________
PD - May 2001 EB3 - I I-485 - RD - 2007 July 30, Nebraska. EAD - APPROVED - 2007 Oct FP - 2007 Sep AP - 2007 Dec FBI Namecheck -- ?? (How to find out?) FP -- Cleared ?? (How to find out?) Last edited by optimystic; 09-29-2008 at 12:12 AM. |
|
||||
|
Thanks, I meant anonymous.
Quite frankly, I think you were reacting to the red dot because if it would have been green, you would have not written a post about it. But because it was red, you couldn't resist expressing your frustration over something you seem to believe strongly. Hence my post about why say I don't care, when actually you do. 5 or 10 minutes, doesn't make much difference. The fact that you are still thinking about it is what matters. All that I am trying to say is, if you really don't care, don't even be tempted to look to find out if others approve of you. Because if you are looking for approval from others, you will always be in this state of conflict to say that you don't care only when someone disapprove your thoughts. Its like, if you have $10 million, and you go out to buy everything that you DON'T WANT, and then wonder why is my house filled with all the things that I don't want. Just like that, when you look and respond to the things that you don't want, you just create more of such events that you don't want. I am merely suggesting you not to look at red/green if you actually don't care. You are free to chose whatever works for you. And if you still want to care about it because you believe that there are better minds, in this case IV core, who would not have made that a requirement to participate in chat, well, in that case, I am sure you would agree with the same better minds, again in this case, IV core, should be allowed to choose not to respond to this thread, instead of demanding a response. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"The whole history of these books is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills." - One Great man to another, 1814 Last edited by sanju; 09-29-2008 at 12:47 AM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Priority Date | good idea | All other Green Card Issues | 2 | 09-08-2010 01:31 PM |
| what is my priority date?? | chidurala | Self-filing, documents, forms, directions, mailing. | 5 | 07-29-2010 02:29 PM |
| LC priority date | avisaq | All other Green Card Issues | 1 | 04-01-2010 04:00 PM |
| Priority will be current in Aug. | rkp27 | Retrogression, priority dates and Visa bulletins | 11 | 07-11-2008 05:52 PM |
| Priority Dates | naveenarjun | All other Green Card Issues | 7 | 02-27-2007 01:50 PM |
| LinkBack |
LinkBack URL |
About LinkBacks |