Immigration Voice - Forums
Get Involved Contact Lawmakers Contact Media Inform Friends Latest Posts Image Image Image Image

Go Back   Immigration Voice > Immigration Voice Issues and Congressional updates > Action Items for everyone
Click to log in with Facebook
Action Items for everyone Webfaxes, phone campaigns and other directives from core group.

advertisement
 

Donation Goal
Goal amount for this month: 10000 USD, Received: 0 USD (0%)
Donate Now
Please contribute to Immigration Voice.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2008, 07:53 PM
Junior Member
Priority Date
:
Apr-06
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
02/01/2007
Chargeability
:
Mexico
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/05/2007
Compare
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 17
xeixas is a jewel in the rough xeixas is a jewel in the rough xeixas is a jewel in the rough
Default Our priority now should be...

... to obtain exact I-485 application numbers from USCIS. We need to demand that they make public how many cases are in the queue for each different country and what is the expected waiting time for each EB category. The request is fair and does not require new legislation.

We need to know, based on the existing legislation, how many years would it take for each of us to get a green card. It makes a big difference if we wait 3 or 10 more years, and it is only fair that we have that information so that we can make decisions in our lives.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2008, 07:55 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Jun-05
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
08/14/2008
Compare
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 604
kshitijnt has a reputation beyond repute kshitijnt has a reputation beyond repute kshitijnt has a reputation beyond repute kshitijnt has a reputation beyond repute kshitijnt has a reputation beyond repute kshitijnt has a reputation beyond repute kshitijnt has a reputation beyond repute kshitijnt has a reputation beyond repute kshitijnt has a reputation beyond repute kshitijnt has a reputation beyond repute kshitijnt has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I am proposing we wait and time the "calculator" campaign to send small inexpensive calculators to USCIS when they come out with numbers for visa wastage.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2008, 09:56 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Apr-04
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 488
hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute
Default

You are on the money my friend.
This should takes precedence over everything else.




Quote:
Originally Posted by xeixas View Post
... to obtain exact I-485 application numbers from USCIS. We need to demand that they make public how many cases are in the queue for each different country and what is the expected waiting time for each EB category. The request is fair and does not require new legislation.

We need to know, based on the existing legislation, how many years would it take for each of us to get a green card. It makes a big difference if we wait 3 or 10 more years, and it is only fair that we have that information so that we can make decisions in our lives.
__________________
-------------------------------------
hopefulgc
EB2 Apr 2004
Approved on 9/9/9
FL chapter: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FL_Immigration_Voice
$100 through Google Order, Plus supported almost all campaigns big and small
-:- from one great country to another
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
If my post has been helpful, please consider contributing to immigrationvoiceThank you.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2008, 12:22 AM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
May-01
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
11/27/2006
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/29/2007
Compare
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 204
optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I have mentioned the same thing in couple of other threads...

I reiterate --- We need a immediate, thorough, persistent, high profile effort from IV community to get just two things

ONE
----

The numbers of pending I-485 cases in all categories (and possibly year wise break down of numbers). Whether using FOI act or requesting via Ombudsman or file lawsuit or whatever it takes

TWO
-----

Requesting USCIS to make public just two bits of information every month. The range of PDs (the oldest and the latest PD) in each category (EB1, EB2, EB3 etc) among the approved cases in a given month.


The first one is the single most important piece of information that can do miracles potentially...... The second one would be icing on the cake...

Why should IV community make this top priority
- We are not asking USCIS/DOS/Congress to change any laws. Which means
- We don't have to lobby hard
- We don't have to spend lots of money
- We don't have to suffer thru the indignation of our cause(5882) being prioritzed lower than some *Horse* S*&% in congressional discussions
- Less scope of this cause/drive being caught in political red tape
- The information we are asking is already available to them and its not too hard to compile..since all data is computerized

- They can't claim they don't have these numbers, since this is the most basic (among other info) info they would have to provide to DOS to set PDs etc...

- The law (FOI) is already in place and on our side. And the process is straight forward as well.

- By having this data made public, would automatically
- Drive transparency and accountability
- Pressure USCIS to work efficiently and FAIRLY.
- Prevent wastage of Visa numbers
- Expose the plight of Legal immigrants to every one.
__________________
PD - May 2001 EB3 - I
I-485 - RD - 2007 July 30, Nebraska.
EAD - APPROVED - 2007 Oct
FP - 2007 Sep
AP - 2007 Dec
FBI Namecheck -- ?? (How to find out?)
FP -- Cleared ?? (How to find out?)

Last edited by optimystic; 09-28-2008 at 11:17 PM.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2008, 12:27 AM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
May-01
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
11/27/2006
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/29/2007
Compare
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 204
optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by optimystic View Post
I have mentioned the same thing in couple of other threads...

I reiterate --- We need a immediate, thorough, persistent, high profile effort from IV community to get just two things

ONE
----

The numbers of pending I-485 cases in all categories (and possibly year wise break down of numbers). Whether using FOI act or requesting via Ombudsman or file lawsuit or whatever it takes

TWO
-----

Requesting USCIS to make public just two bits of information every month. The range of PDs (the oldest and the latest PD) in each category (EB1, EB2, EB3 etc) for all approved cases in a given month.


The first one is the single most important piece of information that can do miracles potentially...... The second one would be icing on the cake...

Why should IV community make this top priority
- We are not asking USCIS/DOS/Congress to change any laws. Which means
- We don't have to lobby hard
- We don't have to spend lots of money
- We don't have to suffer thru the indignation of our cause(5882) being prioritzed lower than some *Horse* S*&% in congressional discussions
- Less scope of this cause/drive being caught in political red tape
- The information we are asking is already available to them and its not too hard to compile..since all data is computerized

- They can't claim they don't have these numbers, since this is the most basic (among other info) info they would have to provide to DOS to set PDs etc...

- The law (FOI) is already in place and on our side. And the process is straight forward as well.

- By having this data made public, would automatically
- Drive transparency and accountability
- Pressure USCIS to work efficiently and FAIRLY.
- Prevent wastage of Visa numbers
- Expose the plight of Legal immigrants to every one.

I sincerely request IV core/admins to comment on this and tell us
- What are the reasons/impediments that prevent us from pursuing this
- What would they need from the IV community to make this happen.

No disrespect but I hope we get some more details than 'Get in touch with your local state chapters'
__________________
PD - May 2001 EB3 - I
I-485 - RD - 2007 July 30, Nebraska.
EAD - APPROVED - 2007 Oct
FP - 2007 Sep
AP - 2007 Dec
FBI Namecheck -- ?? (How to find out?)
FP -- Cleared ?? (How to find out?)

Last edited by optimystic; 09-28-2008 at 12:58 AM.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


advertisement
 
 
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2008, 11:09 AM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Apr-04
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
03/02/2006
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/23/2007
Compare
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 300
bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by optimystic View Post
I have mentioned the same thing in couple of other threads...

I reiterate --- We need a immediate, thorough, persistent, high profile effort from IV community to get just two things

ONE
----

The numbers of pending I-485 cases in all categories (and possibly year wise break down of numbers). Whether using FOI act or requesting via Ombudsman or file lawsuit or whatever it takes

TWO
-----

Requesting USCIS to make public just two bits of information every month. The range of PDs (the oldest and the latest PD) in each category (EB1, EB2, EB3 etc) for all approved cases in a given month.


The first one is the single most important piece of information that can do miracles potentially...... The second one would be icing on the cake...

Why should IV community make this top priority
- We are not asking USCIS/DOS/Congress to change any laws. Which means
- We don't have to lobby hard
- We don't have to spend lots of money
- We don't have to suffer thru the indignation of our cause(5882) being prioritzed lower than some *Horse* S*&% in congressional discussions
- Less scope of this cause/drive being caught in political red tape
- The information we are asking is already available to them and its not too hard to compile..since all data is computerized

- They can't claim they don't have these numbers, since this is the most basic (among other info) info they would have to provide to DOS to set PDs etc...

- The law (FOI) is already in place and on our side. And the process is straight forward as well.

- By having this data made public, would automatically
- Drive transparency and accountability
- Pressure USCIS to work efficiently and FAIRLY.
- Prevent wastage of Visa numbers
- Expose the plight of Legal immigrants to every one.
I CANNOT AGREE MORE. I ALSO REQUEST EVERYBODY TO JUMP IN AND ASK FOR THIS THESE TWO THINGS BEFORE ANYTHING ELSE.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2008, 12:43 PM
Member
Priority Date
:
Nov-03
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
01/01/2008
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
01/01/2008
Compare
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 31
p1234 is a glorious beacon of light p1234 is a glorious beacon of light p1234 is a glorious beacon of light p1234 is a glorious beacon of light p1234 is a glorious beacon of light p1234 is a glorious beacon of light
Default completely support this thread!

Quote:
Originally Posted by internet View Post
I oppose this priority. Just getting the number information is not going to get us greencards. We need to spend our energies for something that gets greencards and not some more statistics. We need to try and think of helpful administrative fixes we can do in the absence of a bill.
Let's first start with getting more info out of USCIS. Haven't enough time and energy spent in trying to get laws changed? None of the bills ever see the light of the day. Isn't that more realistic than pessimistic?

Can we not focus on this first?
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2008, 04:34 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
May-01
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
11/27/2006
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/29/2007
Compare
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 204
optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by internet View Post
I oppose this priority. Just getting the number information is not going to get us greencards. We need to spend our energies for something that gets greencards and not some more statistics. We need to try and think of helpful administrative fixes we can do in the absence of a bill.
I disgree with your disagreement

I mentioned couple of reasons how this data/statistics is going to help us in my post above.

The biggest problem I currently see is that USCIS operations are shrouded in secrecy....Hence there is no accountability or pressure or incentive to process cases fairly in priority order...

Even if we can get some laws passed like Visa recapture....what if USCIS continues to work at snail's pace and continue to process cases out of order.... You can't even blame them any more for Visa number wastage since there will be plenty of visas after recapture and they will respond back "Hey there's no more wastage now, why are you worrried...you will get your GC eventually! " "Or we are short handed , we can't go any faster than this"

So how to force them to work efficiently and process more cases....I see only one Way ---Transparency...if everyone knows how many 2001/2002 cases are rotting in their warehouses while they for no reason play sea-saw with PDs and Processing dates, then there might be some pressure...Hell it might even motivate dormant members of this community to take up arms (placards ! ) and fight (rally ! ) for the cause. AILA etc may be able to support us openly...

I mean this is a very low hanging fruit as opposed to other drives that are being proposed (law changes to allow house buyers to get GC faster, Removal of Country quotas etc).....but the potential for benefit may be huge....Unless I am totally missing some thing here...Hence the request for comments from experienced people from IV core...
__________________
PD - May 2001 EB3 - I
I-485 - RD - 2007 July 30, Nebraska.
EAD - APPROVED - 2007 Oct
FP - 2007 Sep
AP - 2007 Dec
FBI Namecheck -- ?? (How to find out?)
FP -- Cleared ?? (How to find out?)
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2008, 08:30 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
May-01
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
11/27/2006
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/29/2007
Compare
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 204
optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute
Default

^^ bump ^^
__________________
PD - May 2001 EB3 - I
I-485 - RD - 2007 July 30, Nebraska.
EAD - APPROVED - 2007 Oct
FP - 2007 Sep
AP - 2007 Dec
FBI Namecheck -- ?? (How to find out?)
FP -- Cleared ?? (How to find out?)
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2008, 08:48 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Apr-04
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
03/02/2006
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/23/2007
Compare
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 300
bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute bsbawa10 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by optimystic View Post
^^ bump ^^
Hi Optimystic, I think either quite many people have left IV or have no enthusiasm left at all. I fully support you though.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


advertisement
 
 
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2008, 09:45 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Apr-04
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 488
hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute hopefulgc has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Can atleast one person from IV core help us out with this so that people on the sidelines can start joining in and supporting this. We can totalyl use the support.
we gotta get this going.



Quote:
Originally Posted by optimystic View Post
I have mentioned the same thing in couple of other threads...

I reiterate --- We need a immediate, thorough, persistent, high profile effort from IV community to get just two things

ONE
----

The numbers of pending I-485 cases in all categories (and possibly year wise break down of numbers). Whether using FOI act or requesting via Ombudsman or file lawsuit or whatever it takes

TWO
-----

Requesting USCIS to make public just two bits of information every month. The range of PDs (the oldest and the latest PD) in each category (EB1, EB2, EB3 etc) for all approved cases in a given month.


The first one is the single most important piece of information that can do miracles potentially...... The second one would be icing on the cake...

Why should IV community make this top priority
- We are not asking USCIS/DOS/Congress to change any laws. Which means
- We don't have to lobby hard
- We don't have to spend lots of money
- We don't have to suffer thru the indignation of our cause(5882) being prioritzed lower than some *Horse* S*&% in congressional discussions
- Less scope of this cause/drive being caught in political red tape
- The information we are asking is already available to them and its not too hard to compile..since all data is computerized

- They can't claim they don't have these numbers, since this is the most basic (among other info) info they would have to provide to DOS to set PDs etc...

- The law (FOI) is already in place and on our side. And the process is straight forward as well.

- By having this data made public, would automatically
- Drive transparency and accountability
- Pressure USCIS to work efficiently and FAIRLY.
- Prevent wastage of Visa numbers
- Expose the plight of Legal immigrants to every one.
__________________
-------------------------------------
hopefulgc
EB2 Apr 2004
Approved on 9/9/9
FL chapter: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FL_Immigration_Voice
$100 through Google Order, Plus supported almost all campaigns big and small
-:- from one great country to another
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
If my post has been helpful, please consider contributing to immigrationvoiceThank you.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2008, 11:29 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
May-01
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
11/27/2006
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/29/2007
Compare
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 204
optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Got a red dot with a comment "." !

To the commenter:
I don't care about red dot or green dot. But I do care about what you think or want to say, as long as it is a reasonable argument. And I often would prefer it as a open response rather than a hidden comment.

A healthy open debate is a necessary process to arrive at a consensus direction. But when you give me nothing but a "." as your response, I don't know what we can debate about it! I wonder what do you even get by just giving red for my point of view but not saying what your point of view is ! That is not just weak but a NULL argument !

I do appreciate though for not using some foul language in the comment

Reasonable arguments are always welcome. Please do let us know why you disagree.
__________________
PD - May 2001 EB3 - I
I-485 - RD - 2007 July 30, Nebraska.
EAD - APPROVED - 2007 Oct
FP - 2007 Sep
AP - 2007 Dec
FBI Namecheck -- ?? (How to find out?)
FP -- Cleared ?? (How to find out?)
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2008, 11:54 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Jun-03
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
01/20/2005
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140+I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
02/10/2005
Compare
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 956
Blog Entries: 1
sanju is a splendid one to behold sanju is a splendid one to behold sanju is a splendid one to behold sanju is a splendid one to behold sanju is a splendid one to behold sanju is a splendid one to behold
Default Red Green or color blind

Look, either you care about the red/green dot or you don't. It can't be both at the same time. And if you don't care about the red dots or the comments, then why did you dedicate an entire post to red dot. It must have taken you at least 10 minutes to read the comments, think about a response and then draft your response of 10 lines. It makes me sick when someone says that I don't care about the red dots and argues against the red dot/-ve remark or the type/manner of -ve remark. I mean, such post speaks loud and clear that you are very very very mindful of your reputation on the unanimous forum on which your reputation is decided by other unanimous members, without you knowing who those unanimous members are. Why argue with that unanimous member who gave you -ve reputation if you don't care. I see at least 3-4 such posts every day and couldn't stop myself from posting my views about such posts. If you don't care about red/green dots, why even check to see if you got red or green dot?


Quote:
Originally Posted by optimystic View Post
Got a red dot with a comment "." !

To the commenter:
I don't care about red dot or green dot. But I do care about what you think or want to say, as long as it is a reasonable argument. And I often would prefer it as a open response rather than a hidden comment.

A healthy open debate is a necessary process to arrive at a consensus direction. But when you give me nothing but a "." as your response, I don't know what we can debate about it! I wonder what do you even get by just giving red for my point of view but not saying what your point of view is ! That is not just weak but a NULL argument !

I do appreciate though for not using some foul language in the comment

Reasonable arguments are always welcome. Please do let us know why you disagree.
__________________
"The whole history of these books is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills."

- One Great man to another, 1814
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2008, 12:06 AM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
May-01
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
11/27/2006
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/29/2007
Compare
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 204
optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute optimystic has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanju View Post
Look, either you care about the red/green dot or you don't. It can't be both at the same time. And if you don't care about the red dots or the comments, then why did you dedicate an entire post to red dot. It must have taken you at least 10 minutes to read the comments, think about a response and then draft your response of 10 lines. It makes me sick when someone says that I don't care about the red dots and argues against the red dot/-ve remark or the type/manner of -ve remark. I mean, such post speaks loud and clear that you are very very very mindful of your reputation on the unanimous forum on which your reputation is decided by other unanimous members, without you knowing who those unanimous members are. Why argue with that unanimous member who gave you -ve reputation if you don't care. I see at least 3-4 such posts every day and couldn't stop myself from posting my views about such posts. If you don't care about red/green dots, why even check to see if you got red or green dot?
Sanju,

- I thought I made it clear that I cared about the view point/comment (or the absence there of) than the dot itself

- unanimous ---- I think you mean anonymous

- I don't claim that I am totally oblivious to reputation points....they do have some purpose...they obviously have some weight (people pay attention to your view points based on perceived reputation) otherwise IV core would not have made that a requirement to participate in chat. But I am not obsessive about the points either.

- I look at the reputation comments to see what people are thinking about my view point & who agree/disagree with me (some people put their handles in comments so you know who agree with your view point) so I can clarify my views better if I can

- I took me only 5 min to go thru comments and write that post.

- I would have rather preferred you commented a line or two about the topic of this thread than 13 lines you used up commenting on trivial stuff. (I am guilty of doing the same, now that I responded to your post )

-Some times I find any excuse I can to post a response to stealthily bump up the topic I am interested in to the top rather than blatantly "^^BUMP^^" ing

- I hope I responded to all your points (I know from some other posts of yours that you are stickler for getting responses to all points you made)


Now I hope you rather made some comments on the topic in question than this response
__________________
PD - May 2001 EB3 - I
I-485 - RD - 2007 July 30, Nebraska.
EAD - APPROVED - 2007 Oct
FP - 2007 Sep
AP - 2007 Dec
FBI Namecheck -- ?? (How to find out?)
FP -- Cleared ?? (How to find out?)

Last edited by optimystic; 09-29-2008 at 12:12 AM.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2008, 12:43 AM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Jun-03
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
01/20/2005
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140+I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
02/10/2005
Compare
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 956
Blog Entries: 1
sanju is a splendid one to behold sanju is a splendid one to behold sanju is a splendid one to behold sanju is a splendid one to behold sanju is a splendid one to behold sanju is a splendid one to behold
Default

Thanks, I meant anonymous.

Quite frankly, I think you were reacting to the red dot because if it would have been green, you would have not written a post about it. But because it was red, you couldn't resist expressing your frustration over something you seem to believe strongly. Hence my post about why say I don't care, when actually you do.

5 or 10 minutes, doesn't make much difference. The fact that you are still thinking about it is what matters. All that I am trying to say is, if you really don't care, don't even be tempted to look to find out if others approve of you. Because if you are looking for approval from others, you will always be in this state of conflict to say that you don't care only when someone disapprove your thoughts. Its like, if you have $10 million, and you go out to buy everything that you DON'T WANT, and then wonder why is my house filled with all the things that I don't want. Just like that, when you look and respond to the things that you don't want, you just create more of such events that you don't want. I am merely suggesting you not to look at red/green if you actually don't care. You are free to chose whatever works for you. And if you still want to care about it because you believe that there are better minds, in this case IV core, who would not have made that a requirement to participate in chat, well, in that case, I am sure you would agree with the same better minds, again in this case, IV core, should be allowed to choose not to respond to this thread, instead of demanding a response.

Quote:
Originally Posted by optimystic View Post
Sanju,

- I thought I made it clear that I cared about the view point/comment (or the absence there of) than the dot itself

- unanimous ---- I think you mean anonymous

- I don't claim that I am totally oblivious to reputation points....they do have some purpose...they obviously have some weight (people pay attention to your view points based on perceived reputation) otherwise IV core would not have made that a requirement to participate in chat. But I am not obsessive about the points either.

- I look at the reputation comments to see what people are thinking about my view point & who agree/disagree with me (some people put their handles in comments so you know who agree with your view point) so I can clarify my views better if I can

- I took me only 5 min to go thru comments and write that post.

- I would have rather preferred you commented a line or two about the topic of this thread than 13 lines you used up commenting on trivial stuff. (I am guilty of doing the same, now that I responded to your post )

-Some times I find any excuse I can to post a response to stealthily bump up the topic I am interested in to the top rather than blatantly "^^BUMP^^" ing

- I hope I responded to all your points (I know from some other posts of yours that you are stickler for getting responses to all points you made)


Now I hope you rather made some comments on the topic in question than this response
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimystic View Post
Sanju,
- I hope I responded to all your points (I know from some other posts of yours that you are stickler for getting responses to all points you made)
I try not to bother others when I disagree, which is often. But I presume you are referring to my discussion with sc3. It was not my intention to engage with sc3, but couldn't resist responding to some of his assertions. So had to discuss his postings just to make sure that he/she was not walking over others, no other reason. I was not trying to be stickler, just making sure that he did not chose the most convenient path when challenged about his/her views.

Quote:
Originally Posted by optimystic View Post
Sanju,
-Some times I find any excuse I can to post a response to stealthily bump up the topic I am interested in to the top rather than blatantly "^^BUMP^^" ing
That makes two of us.
__________________
"The whole history of these books is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills."

- One Great man to another, 1814

Last edited by sanju; 09-29-2008 at 12:47 AM.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


Reply

Bookmarks

advertisement
 

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Priority Date good idea All other Green Card Issues 2 09-08-2010 01:31 PM
what is my priority date?? chidurala Self-filing, documents, forms, directions, mailing. 5 07-29-2010 02:29 PM
LC priority date avisaq All other Green Card Issues 1 04-01-2010 04:00 PM
Priority will be current in Aug. rkp27 Retrogression, priority dates and Visa bulletins 11 07-11-2008 05:52 PM
Priority Dates naveenarjun All other Green Card Issues 7 02-27-2007 01:50 PM


advertisement

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c)ImmigrationVoice.org