PDA

View Full Version : I-485 Inventory - March 2010


GC9180
03-22-2010, 06:10 PM
http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Green%20Card/Green%20Card%20Through%20a%20Job/Employment%20Based%20I-485%20Pending%20Inventory-Total%203-8-2010.pdf

andycool
03-22-2010, 06:19 PM
http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Green%20Card/Green%20Card%20Through%20a%20Job/Employment%20Based%20I-485%20Pending%20Inventory-Total%203-8-2010.pdf

I think ...This inventory has become like one more visa bulletin ....wait wait wait...and disappointment...

there is hardly any change in numbers ...in fact for some months the numbers have gone up :eek:

MeraNoAayega
03-22-2010, 08:38 PM
I think ...This inventory has become like one more visa bulletin ....wait wait wait...and disappointment...

there is hardly any change in numbers ...in fact for some months the numbers have gone up :eek:

Don't waste your precious time pondering over the document over & over. That document is the worst piece of just I have seen uscis publish...:mad: They say its the total pending cases & i can calculate my position in the waiting list...:( However, they do not include a significant number of application pending at disctrict offices...:confused:

s416504
03-23-2010, 07:03 PM
EB3 9/10/09 12/11/09 3/10/10 Diff
1997 1 11 2 -1
1998 25 18 19 6
1999 19 15 5 14
2000 50 21 14 36
2001 1,630 1,511 1,169 461
2002 8,313 8,155 8,155 158
2003 12,503 12,422 12,070 433
2004 14,734 14,237 14,061 673
2005 9,059 8,782 8,669 390
2006 11,067 10,883 10,698 369
2007 5,113 4,819 4,774 339
2008 88 0 0 88
2009 5 0 0 5
2010 0 0 0 0
Total 62,607 60,874 59,636 2971

immigrant2007
03-24-2010, 12:48 AM
IF USCIS doesn't have manpower or skills to gather all data..then take help from us...I think there are lot many among us who are willing to do it voluntarily....thier data s crap....we wait month after month for Visa bulletin --nothing happens...we argue with each other...offer this and that....what happens...we start waiting for next VB.....So Lets see what miracle July VB has....(I will be happy to be proven totally wrong here)...MAx July might bring relief to older guys (in queue for long on EB2)....some of the people who are more anxious than newer or EB3 guys.....They will leave this queue so we will defintiely see a fewer number of updates and anxious wait of VBS and data analysis becuase after EB2 is gone we will know this for sure "EB3 will happen when it has to happen..."
And Whether we like it or not the curse of EB to FB will bite EB guys badly if I am sorry to say but data isn;t complete and gives a shady picture
EB1 ROw is 08JUL04
EB2 ROW is 01JUN06
EB3 ROW is 22MAY01
(This could mean all there are chances that FB ROW countries are retrogessed / oversubscribed here so based on Korea example....not points for guessing its obivious)

Many amonst you are not going to like me for this but we cant keep doing this when the picture is not clear at all , alteast when information we have with us is incomplete or inaccurate (85% for EB accuracy I read in one of the posts...for FB I hope USCIS knows, if they dont then we have 50-50 chances, if they know then we are at thier mercy that how they play with the numbers)
Either Data is incomplete or wrong but we are definitely missing a critical element here...otherwise FB would never have been retrogessed / oversubscribed for these countries

imh1b
03-24-2010, 03:54 PM
Whoever wants information on data should go here http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum2-retrogression-priority-dates-and-visa-bulletins/1286069-i-485-inventory-march-2010-a.html#post1641359
and talk to USCIS or have our lawyers ask it for us in this conference.

imh1b
03-24-2010, 03:55 PM
Whoever wants information on data should go here http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum2-retrogression-priority-dates-and-visa-bulletins/1286069-i-485-inventory-march-2010-a.html#post1641359
and talk to USCIS or have our lawyers ask it for us in this conference.

SL%%
04-04-2010, 10:31 PM
Sorry to disappoint my fellow friends here in the forum. The data shown are those of the Service Centers ONLY and there is a BIG backlog located in District Offices which are NOT included in the data given. In short, the numbers here are worthless to start off.