Immigration Voice - Forums
Register Get Involved Contact Lawmakers Advocacy Discussion Image Image Image Image

Go Back   Immigration Voice > Immigration Voice Issues and Congressional updates > IV Agenda and Legislative Updates
Click to log in with Facebook
IV Agenda and Legislative Updates Immigration Voice's Agenda and Legislative Updates

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-11-2012, 10:10 PM
Administrator
Priority Date
:
Jun-02
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
08/04/2003
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140+I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
10/06/2003
Compare
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 996
Administrator2 has a reputation beyond repute Administrator2 has a reputation beyond repute Administrator2 has a reputation beyond repute Administrator2 has a reputation beyond repute Administrator2 has a reputation beyond repute Administrator2 has a reputation beyond repute Administrator2 has a reputation beyond repute Administrator2 has a reputation beyond repute Administrator2 has a reputation beyond repute Administrator2 has a reputation beyond repute Administrator2 has a reputation beyond repute
Default FAQ for Grassley Amendment to HR3012

As you may already be aware that Senator Grassley made an announcement for lifting his hold on H.R.3012 after reaching an agreement with senior Senator from New York, the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Refugees and Border Security.

We expect that soon some elements, who are against the Grassley amendment, will engage in fear mongering and will employ scare tactics to infuse fear in immigrant community. As recent as last week, some mischievous elements were engaged in false information and misinterpretation of the Grassley Amendment.

To dispel any misinformation and for the better understanding of the community, here is a brief FAQ about the Grassley Amendment.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf HR3012-GrassleyAmendmentFacts.pdf (57.5 KB, 1409 views)

Last edited by Administrator2; 07-12-2012 at 01:52 AM.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


7 out of 7 members found this post helpful.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-11-2012, 11:31 PM
Member
Priority Date
:
Mar-05
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
N/A
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 72
old_hat has a spectacular aura about old_hat has a spectacular aura about old_hat has a spectacular aura about
Default

Was the provision for no judicial review added to the amendment?
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


1 out of 2 members found this post helpful.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2012, 03:08 AM
Junior Member
Priority Date
:
Category
:
N/A
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1
dabz009 is on a distinguished road
Default

Awesome job. le's hope we get HR3012 passed by both house and senate soon.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2012, 03:30 AM
Junior Member
Priority Date
:
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
Labor Certification
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7
makeallcurrent has a reputation beyond repute makeallcurrent has a reputation beyond repute makeallcurrent has a reputation beyond repute makeallcurrent has a reputation beyond repute makeallcurrent has a reputation beyond repute makeallcurrent has a reputation beyond repute makeallcurrent has a reputation beyond repute makeallcurrent has a reputation beyond repute makeallcurrent has a reputation beyond repute makeallcurrent has a reputation beyond repute makeallcurrent has a reputation beyond repute
Thumbs up I dont see anything wrong here ....

Thanks IV for making it clear !!!

I DONT see anything wrong with these amendments like or immigration attorney gods are screaming

This means that the decision regarding intent to conduct an investigation cannot be subject to judicial review i.e. the audit will be conducted as determined and the decision to conduct the same cannot be challenged in court. However, other parts of the investigation/audit,
including any adverse results/decision of the investigation, can be subject to judicial
review as with current audits.

Only the decision to audit cannot be challenged in the court, still the outcome of the investigation can be challenged. I dont see anything wrong with this,
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


2 out of 2 members found this post helpful.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2012, 05:50 AM
Donor
Priority Date
:
Aug-04
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140+I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 296
skrish has a reputation beyond repute skrish has a reputation beyond repute skrish has a reputation beyond repute skrish has a reputation beyond repute skrish has a reputation beyond repute skrish has a reputation beyond repute skrish has a reputation beyond repute skrish has a reputation beyond repute skrish has a reputation beyond repute skrish has a reputation beyond repute skrish has a reputation beyond repute
Default

awesome job guys, very Well thought out move to dispel potential misinformation!
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2012, 07:58 AM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
N/A
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 952
h1techSlave has a reputation beyond repute h1techSlave has a reputation beyond repute h1techSlave has a reputation beyond repute h1techSlave has a reputation beyond repute h1techSlave has a reputation beyond repute h1techSlave has a reputation beyond repute h1techSlave has a reputation beyond repute h1techSlave has a reputation beyond repute h1techSlave has a reputation beyond repute h1techSlave has a reputation beyond repute h1techSlave has a reputation beyond repute
Default pretty cool

pretty cool
__________________
Support Fairness! DONATE
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2012, 09:10 AM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
N/A
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
Labor Certification
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 143
katta has a reputation beyond repute katta has a reputation beyond repute katta has a reputation beyond repute katta has a reputation beyond repute katta has a reputation beyond repute katta has a reputation beyond repute katta has a reputation beyond repute katta has a reputation beyond repute katta has a reputation beyond repute katta has a reputation beyond repute katta has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by makeallcurrent View Post
Thanks IV for making it clear !!!

I DONT see anything wrong with these amendments like or immigration attorney gods are screaming

This means that the decision regarding intent to conduct an investigation cannot be subject to judicial review i.e. the audit will be conducted as determined and the decision to conduct the same cannot be challenged in court. However, other parts of the investigation/audit,
including any adverse results/decision of the investigation, can be subject to judicial
review as with current audits.

Only the decision to audit cannot be challenged in the court, still the outcome of the investigation can be challenged. I dont see anything wrong with this,

Can you provide the section in the bill that says the outcome of investigation can be challenged in court?
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2012, 09:23 AM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Mar-04
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
06/21/2004
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/24/2007
Compare
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 128
MahaBharatGC has a reputation beyond repute MahaBharatGC has a reputation beyond repute MahaBharatGC has a reputation beyond repute MahaBharatGC has a reputation beyond repute MahaBharatGC has a reputation beyond repute MahaBharatGC has a reputation beyond repute MahaBharatGC has a reputation beyond repute MahaBharatGC has a reputation beyond repute MahaBharatGC has a reputation beyond repute MahaBharatGC has a reputation beyond repute MahaBharatGC has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Very Fair and I am up for preventing Fraud and using shortcuts against established guidelines!
__________________
---------------------
Contribution: 100/- & 50/- & 100/- & 6 months recurring 25$
EB3 priority: March 24 2004
I-485 Receipt Date: July-25-2007
*************************
Since year 2000 GC process is like Maha Bharat Saga...
---------------------
yE dESa mEginA, yendugAliDina
yE pITha mekkinA, yevvaredu raina
pogaDarA, nI talli bhoomi bhAratini
niluparA, nI jAti ninDu garvammu
lEdurA iTuvanTi BoodEvi yendu
lErurA manavanTi pouru linkendu...
-Rayaprolu Subbarao
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2012, 09:32 AM
Administrator
Priority Date
:
Apr-09
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
01/31/2012
Compare
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 189
The Alchemist has a reputation beyond repute The Alchemist has a reputation beyond repute The Alchemist has a reputation beyond repute The Alchemist has a reputation beyond repute The Alchemist has a reputation beyond repute The Alchemist has a reputation beyond repute The Alchemist has a reputation beyond repute The Alchemist has a reputation beyond repute The Alchemist has a reputation beyond repute The Alchemist has a reputation beyond repute The Alchemist has a reputation beyond repute
Lightbulb PDF of Aman's Email to IV Members

If you are one of the few who didn't get the email from Aman, click on the attached file to see the email that went out to IV Members.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf IV.pdf (119.1 KB, 180 views)
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2012, 09:36 AM
Junior Member
Priority Date
:
Jul-05
Category
:
N/A
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1
azim is on a distinguished road
Default Nice Work and fingers crossed!

Hope no one is gonna torpedo this one and hope it gets passed soon so that we all can be benefited from the visa numbers of FY 2012.
Thank you everyone for all the efforts.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2012, 03:27 PM
Junior Member
Priority Date
:
Category
:
N/A
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1
rb4gc is on a distinguished road
Default

The FAQ says

The original per country limit removal language as passed by the House is intact and is effective from FY 2012.
Effective from FY 2012, what does that mean?
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2012, 03:32 PM
Donor
Priority Date
:
Oct-06
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
02/10/2008
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
N/A
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 584
starscream has a reputation beyond repute starscream has a reputation beyond repute starscream has a reputation beyond repute starscream has a reputation beyond repute starscream has a reputation beyond repute starscream has a reputation beyond repute starscream has a reputation beyond repute starscream has a reputation beyond repute starscream has a reputation beyond repute starscream has a reputation beyond repute starscream has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Fiscal year in the US is defined as :
It runs from October 1 of the prior year through September 30 of the year being described. For example:
•FY 2012 is from October 1 2011 through September 30 2012.

Effective from FY 2012 would mean effective from October 1, 2011

Quote:
Originally Posted by rb4gc View Post
The FAQ says

The original per country limit removal language as passed by the House is intact and is effective from FY 2012.
Effective from FY 2012, what does that mean?
__________________
Support HR-3012 and Support Fairness!
About HR3012
Like us on Facebook
+1 on Google+
Follow us on Twitter
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #13 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2012, 03:35 PM
Donor
Priority Date
:
Nov-03
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
06/30/2007
Compare
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 129
green_mile has a reputation beyond repute green_mile has a reputation beyond repute green_mile has a reputation beyond repute green_mile has a reputation beyond repute green_mile has a reputation beyond repute green_mile has a reputation beyond repute green_mile has a reputation beyond repute green_mile has a reputation beyond repute green_mile has a reputation beyond repute green_mile has a reputation beyond repute green_mile has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rb4gc View Post
The FAQ says

The original per country limit removal language as passed by the House is intact and is effective from FY 2012.
Effective from FY 2012, what does that mean?
Welcome to Immigration voice, please join us in effort to promote fairness in employment immigration, please contribute and update your profile with details such as country of chargiability , priority date etc.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #14 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2012, 03:37 PM
Member
Priority Date
:
Jun-04
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
05/25/2007
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
08/12/2007
Compare
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 55
flthere has a reputation beyond repute flthere has a reputation beyond repute flthere has a reputation beyond repute flthere has a reputation beyond repute flthere has a reputation beyond repute flthere has a reputation beyond repute flthere has a reputation beyond repute flthere has a reputation beyond repute flthere has a reputation beyond repute flthere has a reputation beyond repute flthere has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by starscream View Post
Fiscal year in the US is defined as :
It runs from October 1 of the prior year through September 30 of the year being described. For example:
•FY 2012 is from October 1 2011 through September 30 2012.

Effective from FY 2012 would mean effective from October 1, 2011
But I suppose that all the 140k visas for FY 2012 are being used up entirely, isn't it ? And we didn't see EB2 getting the spillover either this year !
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #15 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2012, 05:39 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Dec-08
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 197
forever_waiting has a reputation beyond repute forever_waiting has a reputation beyond repute forever_waiting has a reputation beyond repute forever_waiting has a reputation beyond repute forever_waiting has a reputation beyond repute forever_waiting has a reputation beyond repute forever_waiting has a reputation beyond repute forever_waiting has a reputation beyond repute forever_waiting has a reputation beyond repute forever_waiting has a reputation beyond repute forever_waiting has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Effective date is Oct 1, 2011 period. How to implement it is the responsibility of the USCIS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flthere View Post
But I suppose that all the 140k visas for FY 2012 are being used up entirely, isn't it ? And we didn't see EB2 getting the spillover either this year !
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
We applaud Senator Grassley for lifting the hold from HR3012 Administrator2 IV Agenda and Legislative Updates 178 07-18-2012 08:11 PM
UPDATE/ACTION ITEM:HR3012: Ask your employer to sign this petition supporting HR3012 Administrator2 IV Agenda and Legislative Updates 414 07-10-2012 12:53 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c)ImmigrationVoice.org