Immigration Voice - Forums
Register Get Involved Contact Lawmakers Advocacy Discussion Image Image Image Image

Go Back   Immigration Voice > Immigration Voice Issues and Congressional updates > IV Agenda and Legislative Updates
Click to log in with Facebook
IV Agenda and Legislative Updates Immigration Voice's Agenda and Legislative Updates

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2013, 02:32 PM
Member
Priority Date
:
Jul-10
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 85
Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute
Default

If the bill is passed this year, won't they clear the backlogs this year?
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2013, 03:16 PM
Member
Priority Date
:
Oct-10
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 43
shortduck is a splendid one to behold shortduck is a splendid one to behold shortduck is a splendid one to behold shortduck is a splendid one to behold shortduck is a splendid one to behold shortduck is a splendid one to behold shortduck is a splendid one to behold
Default

Thanks for your reply.
Demand data on and before EB2: 11575 (http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/Empl...utOffDates.pdf)

So if these use the Track2 route:1/7 ie. 1653 will be given GC.

But; 40% of 140,000 = 56,000 - 1653 = 54347, so these will be given to those who filed labor after 2008. A total of 118,250 applicants after 2008.

Is my understanding right ?
__________________
Support H.R. 3012
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2013, 05:12 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Oct-03
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
07/20/2007
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/20/2007
Compare
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 387
sanju_dba has a reputation beyond repute sanju_dba has a reputation beyond repute sanju_dba has a reputation beyond repute sanju_dba has a reputation beyond repute sanju_dba has a reputation beyond repute sanju_dba has a reputation beyond repute sanju_dba has a reputation beyond repute sanju_dba has a reputation beyond repute sanju_dba has a reputation beyond repute sanju_dba has a reputation beyond repute sanju_dba has a reputation beyond repute
Default

SEC. 2301.
(8) INELIGIBILITY OF ALIENS WITH PENDING OR APPROVED PETITIONS- An alien who has a petition pending or approved in another immigrant category under this section or section 201 may not apply for a merit-based immigrant visa.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2013, 07:33 PM
Member
Priority Date
:
Category
:
N/A
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 33
aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanju_dba View Post
SEC. 2301.
(8) INELIGIBILITY OF ALIENS WITH PENDING OR APPROVED PETITIONS- An alien who has a petition pending or approved in another immigrant category under this section or section 201 may not apply for a merit-based immigrant visa.
The above applies to merit-based track one (points system) for new applicants. All of section 2301 is for merit-based track one. This entire thread is about merit-based track two. So, the above does not apply to the case being discussed in this thread.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #20 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2013, 07:43 PM
Member
Priority Date
:
Category
:
N/A
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 33
aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sage2006 View Post
I have not checked all the posts but the title is misleading.
The way I understand it, existing EB system is slightly redefined (with per country caps removed, dependents/STEM (if received degree in past 5 yrs before labor petition as filed) exempt, visa recapture etc etc.
In parallel if someone has had their EB aplication pending for 5 years at the time of enactment of this act and wishes to apply under merit-based track2, then they are welcome to do so and avail of the 1/7 or so allottment that will go towards EB backlogs removal. backlog removal measures in EB will stay put in parallel and should remove most backlogs anyway.
We will close this thread shortly...pls use existing main thread discussing amendments to discuss bill provisions as well. Too many threads tend to be confusing.
It is not clear from the bill that there is any other "backlog removal measures in EB will stay put in parallel". As far as I could tell, the merit-based track two, which has the 1/7 per year formula, is the only path for existing EB backlog. There are no other parallel measures. Any measures that remove country-specific cap, recapture unused visas, etc., seem to be useful only for new applicants or applicants who have been in the queue for less than 5 years. The way the bill reads, all existing EB backlog applications will go into merit-based track two by default if they are older than 5 years. We don't have a choice with this.

This means, many people have been waiting in the queue for more than 5 years and get pushed into merit-based track 2, could potentially get their green cards AFTER new people in merit-based track 1 get theirs.

Someone please correct me if any of the above are not right.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #21 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2013, 08:22 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Aug-06
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
10/01/2007
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/30/2007
Compare
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 437
Blog Entries: 2
psaxena has a reputation beyond repute psaxena has a reputation beyond repute psaxena has a reputation beyond repute psaxena has a reputation beyond repute psaxena has a reputation beyond repute psaxena has a reputation beyond repute psaxena has a reputation beyond repute psaxena has a reputation beyond repute psaxena has a reputation beyond repute psaxena has a reputation beyond repute psaxena has a reputation beyond repute
Unhappy ??

This doesn't make any sense, the backlog will keep waiting... and others who apply after 2008 will be given preference..
Who is drafting the bill and putting in the amendments?
__________________
Thanks

Support HR-3012 and Support Fairness!

Facebook | Google+ | Twitter | Contribute | HR3012 Wiki

Info on Rally | Accommodation | Air Miles | Carpool | Merchandize | Posters | Volunteers

--------------------------
Result for psaxena:
Your position is 53193 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Aug-06" and Category "EB3" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Sep, 2028.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #22 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2013, 08:25 PM
Donor/Moderator
Priority Date
:
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
12/22/2009
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 376
sage2006 has a reputation beyond repute sage2006 has a reputation beyond repute sage2006 has a reputation beyond repute sage2006 has a reputation beyond repute sage2006 has a reputation beyond repute sage2006 has a reputation beyond repute sage2006 has a reputation beyond repute sage2006 has a reputation beyond repute sage2006 has a reputation beyond repute sage2006 has a reputation beyond repute sage2006 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

that is not correct.
merit-based immigrant visas (specifically track 2 - section 2302 as per RPI section) have been primarily designed for undocumented and DREAMers to start applying for GCs when they are eligible (DREAMers coming in first since they can apply after 5 years on RPI status). however anyone (including who would otherwise be EB applicants) can also collect points and apply for this merit-based category. Weird thing is there is no lower cut-off as in other points-based systems.
Not sure how you draw the conclusion in red below.
Remember that the bill states that ALL 120K merit-based immigrant visas will go to EB3 during first 4 fiscal years. Thereafter it gets split between Tier1 and Tier2 within Track 1. In addition, there is a separate section 2304 and 2306 where the backlog reduction measures like per-country cap removal, visa recapture etc are defined clearly with reference to EB world wide levels which are unchanged (these are not defined in the merit-based section of the bill). For each backlog elimination provision, there is an effective date and once the effective date kicks in ANYONE currently in the EB queue gets the benefit. You seem to be mixing up multiple sections.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aswami View Post
It is not clear from the bill that there is any other "backlog removal measures in EB will stay put in parallel". As far as I could tell, the merit-based track two, which has the 1/7 per year formula, is the only path for existing EB backlog. There are no other parallel measures. Any measures that remove country-specific cap, recapture unused visas, etc., seem to be useful only for new applicants or applicants who have been in the queue for less than 5 years. The way the bill reads, all existing EB backlog applications will go into merit-based track two by default if they are older than 5 years. We don't have a choice with this.

This means, many people have been waiting in the queue for more than 5 years and get pushed into merit-based track 2, could potentially get their green cards AFTER new people in merit-based track 1 get theirs.

Someone please correct me if any of the above are not right.
__________________
CNN iReport | Facebook | Google+ | Twitter | YouTube

Last edited by sage2006; 04-23-2013 at 08:30 PM.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #23 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2013, 09:51 PM
Member
Priority Date
:
Jul-10
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 85
Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute Gandhi_II has a reputation beyond repute
Red face

"Any immigrants who have been working legally in this country for 10 years would also move rapidly to receive green cards, either through the current system or later through the new merit system."

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/12/us...plan.html?_r=0
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #24 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2013, 12:02 AM
Member
Priority Date
:
Category
:
N/A
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 33
aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of aswami has much to be proud of
Default Thanks for the clarifications

Quote:
Originally Posted by sage2006 View Post
that is not correct.
merit-based immigrant visas (specifically track 2 - section 2302 as per RPI section) have been primarily designed for undocumented and DREAMers to start applying for GCs when they are eligible (DREAMers coming in first since they can apply after 5 years on RPI status). however anyone (including who would otherwise be EB applicants) can also collect points and apply for this merit-based category. Weird thing is there is no lower cut-off as in other points-based systems.
Not sure how you draw the conclusion in red below.
Remember that the bill states that ALL 120K merit-based immigrant visas will go to EB3 during first 4 fiscal years. Thereafter it gets split between Tier1 and Tier2 within Track 1. In addition, there is a separate section 2304 and 2306 where the backlog reduction measures like per-country cap removal, visa recapture etc are defined clearly with reference to EB world wide levels which are unchanged (these are not defined in the merit-based section of the bill). For each backlog elimination provision, there is an effective date and once the effective date kicks in ANYONE currently in the EB queue gets the benefit. You seem to be mixing up multiple sections.
Thanks a lot for the clarifications. And you are correct, I am mixing up multiple sections. This is the first time I am reading actual laws and bills in my life. The syntax is more complex than many modern programming languages. :-)
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #25 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2013, 07:37 PM
Member
Priority Date
:
Apr-04
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/17/2007
Compare
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 76
open.247 is infamous around these parts open.247 is infamous around these parts open.247 is infamous around these parts open.247 is infamous around these parts open.247 is infamous around these parts open.247 is infamous around these parts open.247 is infamous around these parts
Default Eb Backlog now will clean faster

hi




Quote:
Originally Posted by dkar View Post
CIR: Pending EB will be approved in 7 batches starting FY2015 and ending in FY2021?

Unless I am getting this wrong, it appears to me that:
All EB based applicants whose application is pending for 5 years the day before this law is enacted, will be divided into 7 batches(i.e. with priority date upto 2008, approx). And each batch will be approved starting FY2015 and ending in 2021.

(Page 269)
17 SEC. 2302. MERIT-BASED TRACK TWO.

(Page 270)
4 (c) ELIGIBILITY.—Beginning on October 1, 2014, the
5 following aliens shall be eligible for merit-based immigrant
6 visas under this section:
7 (1) EMPLOYMENT-BASED IMMIGRANTS.—An
8 alien who is the beneficiary of a petition filed before
9 the date of the enactment of this Act to accord sta
10 tus under section 203(b) of the Immigration and
11 Nationality Act, if the visa has not been issued with
12 in 5 years after the date on which such petition was
13 filed.

(Page 271)
(d) ALLOCATION OF EMPLOYMENT-SPONSORED
14 MERIT-BASED IMMIGRANT VISAS.—In each of the fiscal
15 years 2015 through and including 2021, the Secretary of
16 State shall allocate to aliens described in subsection (c)(1)
17 a number of merit-based immigrant visas equal to 1⁄7 of
18 the number of aliens described in subsection (c)(1) whose
19 visas had not been issued as of the date of the enactment
20 of this Act.
EB2 /EB3 backlog will cleaned up faster
As sson as per country quota is eliminated and spillover is allowed dates will move faster.
USCIS need to concentrate on illigal's applications and their background check etc. USCIS will have to make resources available for all millions of Illegals . To do that they have to clean this mess of Backlogs . which should and will help all of EB2/EB3 people.
And also if they(USCIS) dont do that it will considered there is no motivation/reward for people who came legally and obeyed all laws and paid taxes and renewal fees .Further
it will be discriminating as how can they make illegals path to citizenship in 10 years. where as people like us already have gone through their 10 years tax paying period and stucked in backlog of per country visa numbers.
so keeping above facts backlogs will and should be cleared as soon as this Bill get into execution stage. If it does not then we have serious problem of democracy.

Thanks
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #26 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2013, 08:22 PM
Junior Member
Priority Date
:
Category
:
N/A
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3
saambha is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sage2006 View Post
that is not correct.
merit-based immigrant visas (specifically track 2 - section 2302 as per RPI section) have been primarily designed for undocumented and DREAMers to start applying for GCs when they are eligible (DREAMers coming in first since they can apply after 5 years on RPI status). however anyone (including who would otherwise be EB applicants) can also collect points and apply for this merit-based category. Weird thing is there is no lower cut-off as in other points-based systems.
Not sure how you draw the conclusion in red below.
Remember that the bill states that ALL 120K merit-based immigrant visas will go to EB3 during first 4 fiscal years. Thereafter it gets split between Tier1 and Tier2 within Track 1. In addition, there is a separate section 2304 and 2306 where the backlog reduction measures like per-country cap removal, visa recapture etc are defined clearly with reference to EB world wide levels which are unchanged (these are not defined in the merit-based section of the bill). For each backlog elimination provision, there is an effective date and once the effective date kicks in ANYONE currently in the EB queue gets the benefit. You seem to be mixing up multiple sections.
Section 2306 for removing per country limitations has this:

"EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by
this section shall take effect 1 year after the date of the
enactment of this Act."

Am i reading it incorrectly or does it really mean that the per country limit stays for another year after the act becomes a law? Won't it negate other backlog elimination steps for an extra year?
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #27 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2013, 10:26 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Oct-04
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/16/2007
Compare
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 157
Blog Entries: 1
Murthy has a reputation beyond repute Murthy has a reputation beyond repute Murthy has a reputation beyond repute Murthy has a reputation beyond repute Murthy has a reputation beyond repute Murthy has a reputation beyond repute Murthy has a reputation beyond repute Murthy has a reputation beyond repute Murthy has a reputation beyond repute Murthy has a reputation beyond repute Murthy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Yes this is correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by sage2006 View Post
that is not correct.
merit-based immigrant visas (specifically track 2 - section 2302 as per RPI section) have been primarily designed for undocumented and DREAMers to start applying for GCs when they are eligible (DREAMers coming in first since they can apply after 5 years on RPI status). however anyone (including who would otherwise be EB applicants) can also collect points and apply for this merit-based category. Weird thing is there is no lower cut-off as in other points-based systems.
Not sure how you draw the conclusion in red below.
Remember that the bill states that ALL 120K merit-based immigrant visas will go to EB3 during first 4 fiscal years. Thereafter it gets split between Tier1 and Tier2 within Track 1. In addition, there is a separate section 2304 and 2306 where the backlog reduction measures like per-country cap removal, visa recapture etc are defined clearly with reference to EB world wide levels which are unchanged (these are not defined in the merit-based section of the bill). For each backlog elimination provision, there is an effective date and once the effective date kicks in ANYONE currently in the EB queue gets the benefit. You seem to be mixing up multiple sections.
Members mix up sections and gets confused and writing confused posts.dkar started this thread.Looks he totally got confused with sections.All Track 1 and Track 2 not for Pending I-485's who are waiting for visas.Actually Effective date of Section 2306 Removal country caps is most important for EB guys.As per bill this effective date is FY2015.IV must work on this for an amendment so that effective date would be FY2014.With this amendment EB folks get immediate relief.sage2006 please let me correct if my understanding is wrong.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Expedited Removal, New H4 application anand_bbb Non-Immigrant Visa 0 04-13-2011 10:47 AM
removal and re-entry karen77 FREE Lawyer conference calls 1 12-10-2010 03:05 PM
Removal of condition dreaming_immigrant Immigrant Visa 0 07-22-2009 05:09 AM
Cancellation of Removal - Final try hdrainusa Out of status, employment gap and status revalidation 4 09-14-2007 01:38 AM
Removal process mgarvey Receipt tracker of 485, EAD and AP applications 4 08-07-2007 04:17 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c)ImmigrationVoice.org