Immigration Voice - Forums
Register Get Involved Contact Lawmakers Advocacy Discussion Image Image Image Image

Go Back   Immigration Voice > 140 stage > Ability to pay issues and other 140 RFEs etc.
Click to log in with Facebook
Ability to pay issues and other 140 RFEs etc. All discussions about Ability to pay issues and other 140 RFEs etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2007, 10:46 AM
Junior Member
Priority Date
:
Dec-06
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3
sreech is on a distinguished road
Default

Hello All

I applied 140 in EB2 and got an RFE on Education.I have a Bachelors(3year) and masters(2years) with 8 years of experience.I have submitted an education valution with the petition still got an RFE asking to provide one with the following points
1)Consider formal education only, not practical training experience
2) State the collegiate training was post secondary education i .e. did the applicant complete the United States equivalent of high school before entering college
3)provide a detailed explanation of the material evaluated and how the evaluator has reached their conclusions rather than a simple conclusive statement

any one please help who has gone through this before

thanks
sree
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #62 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2007, 01:26 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Sep-06
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I-140
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 136
arunkotte can only hope to improve
Default Re: RFE ability to pay

On the tax return 1120S Schedule L we have about 170,000 in the retained earnings line. Can this be used as part of the net current assets?
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #63 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2007, 01:33 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
N/A
Category
:
N/A
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
N/A
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 595
digital2k has a reputation beyond repute digital2k has a reputation beyond repute digital2k has a reputation beyond repute digital2k has a reputation beyond repute digital2k has a reputation beyond repute digital2k has a reputation beyond repute digital2k has a reputation beyond repute digital2k has a reputation beyond repute digital2k has a reputation beyond repute digital2k has a reputation beyond repute digital2k has a reputation beyond repute
Default *

*

Last edited by digital2k; 08-14-2007 at 02:41 PM.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #64 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2007, 09:27 AM
Member
Priority Date
:
Category
:
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 78
lelica32 will become famous soon enough
Default

I have a question. My Firm is a really small one, just 1 employer + my = 2. The tax returns are not so good, becouse all the money was invested in a second business. The firm started in June 2005. The Firm has ca. $65.000 in a saving account. My salary will be $2000/month. Will be enough this $65.000 for the USCIS, for the Ability to pay.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #65 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2007, 11:31 AM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Sep-06
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I-140
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 136
arunkotte can only hope to improve
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by americandesi View Post
Please read page 2 of Yates memo (Refer link). The Initial evidence "Annual report", "Tax return", and "Audited financial statement" map to "Employment of the beneficiary", "Net income" and "Net current assets" respectively.

http://www.visaportal.com/downloads/...20to%20pay.pdf


My 140 is approved today. Tax returns can be used to show the net current assets satisfy the ability to pay criteria. May sure you back it up with some good explaination.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #66 (permalink)  
Old 08-28-2007, 10:06 AM
Junior Member
Priority Date
:
Jan-03
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I-140+I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1
GCstuck is on a distinguished road
Angry

On Aug 11, 2007 - I 140 Denied Due to Ability To Pay issues

Description for denial ( I have also attached the denial notice)->

They looked at years 2003 to 2006 history for I140 since PD is JAN 03.

* Reason 1 - Lower salary than specified in labor
Preferred Wage in labor - 78,750
W2(2003) - $76,850; W2(2004) - $75,638; W2(2005) - $31,652;
W2 for 2005 is less due to company merger. I have another W2 from new company for 2005. I moved to another company due to merger but lawyer continued GC throgh old employer since the both companies exists after the merger.

* Reason 2 - negative net income of the petitioner
2003 (-$537,841); 2004(-$445,493); 2005(-$527,298); 2006(Not Submitted);

* Reason 3 - 2003 and 2004 OK but net current assets are -ve in 2005
and my lawyer did not provide 2006 information

Acceptable Assets Aceptable Liabilities Net Current Assets
2003 $4,272,733 $3,789,359 $483,374
2004 $4,871,615 $4,660,879 $210,736
2005 $5,047,775 $6,494,111 ($1,446,336)
2006 ---- Not submitted [ Company has not filed taxes yet]
For 2006 they will be filing big loss.

Does anyone know any way out of this.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #67 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2007, 11:09 AM
Member
Priority Date
:
Apr-03
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
12/08/2006
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140+I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
06/28/2007
Compare
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 26
arunsush is on a distinguished road
Default Approved after RFE

Wanted to let those interested know that my 140 EB2 got approved yesterday after RFE.

The RFE was on educational grounds. I have a 5 year integrated Msc in Physics and was -how a degree in Physics is equivalent to computer Science.

My attorney submitted a detailed analysis of all the course and a fresh educational evaluation on the 28th and it got approved on 30th.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #68 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2007, 08:37 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Jul-07
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
08/14/2007
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
08/14/2007
Compare
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 291
americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GCstuck View Post
On Aug 11, 2007 - I 140 Denied Due to Ability To Pay issues

Description for denial ( I have also attached the denial notice)->

They looked at years 2003 to 2006 history for I140 since PD is JAN 03.

* Reason 1 - Lower salary than specified in labor
Preferred Wage in labor - 78,750
W2(2003) - $76,850; W2(2004) - $75,638; W2(2005) - $31,652;
W2 for 2005 is less due to company merger. I have another W2 from new company for 2005. I moved to another company due to merger but lawyer continued GC throgh old employer since the both companies exists after the merger.

* Reason 2 - negative net income of the petitioner
2003 (-$537,841); 2004(-$445,493); 2005(-$527,298); 2006(Not Submitted);

* Reason 3 - 2003 and 2004 OK but net current assets are -ve in 2005
and my lawyer did not provide 2006 information

Acceptable Assets Aceptable Liabilities Net Current Assets
2003 $4,272,733 $3,789,359 $483,374
2004 $4,871,615 $4,660,879 $210,736
2005 $5,047,775 $6,494,111 ($1,446,336)
2006 ---- Not submitted [ Company has not filed taxes yet]
For 2006 they will be filing big loss.

Does anyone know any way out of this.
I am sorry to know that your I-140 application got denied after such a long wait.

Your application was denied not with a combination of
Reason 1 , 2 & 3, but each reason by itself was insufficient to prove ability to pay. Your employer should meet atleast one of these to prove "Ability to Pay".

It's deplorable that most attorney's don't educate small employers on meeting ability to pay even before filing the Labor Certification.

I would suggest that you appeal the case with supporting statements from a good CPA and in the meantime go for a fresh labor certification.
__________________
EB2 - India - PD Jul 2007

Last edited by americandesi; 09-06-2007 at 09:06 PM.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #69 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2007, 02:37 AM
Junior Member
Priority Date
:
Apr-01
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
05/05/2007
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140+I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
05/05/2007
Compare
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 15
gneerajg is on a distinguished road
Default Ref

I got a ref today the reason ability not to pay. They state that in line 21ordinary business income is less than what it should be according to PW and based on that employer was not able to PW in those years like from 2001 to 2006but the gross income was always in between 600000-1000000 each year. but can they relate your old returns with new PW. I mean does it matter based on your last 5 returns ability not to pay but currently I am drawing more than PW and my employer never filed tax`return with loss. pl. advice Does I need good CPA

40k+ in 2006
35k+ in 2005
33k+ in 2004

EB-3 PD 2001
Filed I-140 & I-485 on May 5,2007
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #70 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2007, 11:57 AM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Jun-06
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
08/01/2006
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
07/25/2007
Compare
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 259
texcan is a name known to all texcan is a name known to all texcan is a name known to all texcan is a name known to all texcan is a name known to all texcan is a name known to all
Default if you are drawing more than PW you are fine

Your attoney should be able to defend your case based on you salary more than PW.

The GC process is for future employement, your bosses ability to pay exists since he has paid you more salary than PW.

Your employer may be making loss every year, but he is paying you more than PW. Now your salary in itself is an expense for employer, so the fact that he is paying you may be making his financials look a little weak in term of profit loss.


Look at other threads on RFE issues, and talk to your lawyer.
I think you are fine.
__________________
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer , please seek a professional lawyers opinion.

** Contributed $200 & Pledged for $100 every month **
- 485 receipt received : Sept 17th
-EAD - Card production ordered - Sept 24th
-485: NSC - Mailed july 25th. Received jul 26
-140: TSC - Approved Jul/aug 07
-Labor: TSC - June 06
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #71 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2007, 12:58 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Mar-03
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
03/02/2007
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
06/08/2007
Compare
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 213
vandanaverdia has much to be proud of vandanaverdia has much to be proud of vandanaverdia has much to be proud of vandanaverdia has much to be proud of vandanaverdia has much to be proud of vandanaverdia has much to be proud of vandanaverdia has much to be proud of vandanaverdia has much to be proud of
Default

Guys, there is a fund drive for 30k in 8 days, please help us to achieve the goal and contribute. 18k more to go.
Help IV help you... Come to DC!!!
__________________
Help IV help YOU...

WA State Chapter group.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WA_Immigration_Voice/
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #72 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2007, 12:34 PM
Junior Member
Priority Date
:
N/A
Category
:
N/A
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
Labor Certification
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1
amao is on a distinguished road
Default company w/ more than 100 employees

Is it true that for a company w/ more than 100 employees, a statement letter from the CFO will be adequate as a proof for ability to pay? What info should the CFO be included in the letter?

I was so screwed by my lawyer in the LC process so I plan on DIY for the I-140 & 485.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #73 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2007, 01:23 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Sep-06
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
Processing Stage
:
I-140
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 136
arunkotte can only hope to improve
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amao View Post
Is it true that for a company w/ more than 100 employees, a statement letter from the CFO will be adequate as a proof for ability to pay? What info should the CFO be included in the letter?

I was so screwed by my lawyer in the LC process so I plan on DIY for the I-140 & 485.


Yes, you can submit a letter from CFO if the company has more than 100 employees.
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #74 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2007, 02:30 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Jul-07
Category
:
EB2
I140 Mailed Date
:
08/14/2007
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-485
I485 Mailed Date
:
08/14/2007
Compare
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 291
americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future americandesi has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by texcan View Post
Your attoney should be able to defend your case based on you salary more than PW.

The GC process is for future employement, your bosses ability to pay exists since he has paid you more salary than PW.

Your employer may be making loss every year, but he is paying you more than PW. Now your salary in itself is an expense for employer, so the fact that he is paying you may be making his financials look a little weak in term of profit loss.


Look at other threads on RFE issues, and talk to your lawyer.
I think you are fine.
When it comes to "employment of beneficiary" in proving ability to pay, the employer should prove that he had paid the proffered wage from the time PD is established continuing until the beneficiary obtains permanent residence.

It doesn’t matter if he’s getting paid the proffered wage now. The employer should prove the same from the time PD is established.
__________________
EB2 - India - PD Jul 2007
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


  #75 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2007, 02:43 PM
Senior Member
Priority Date
:
Sep-04
Category
:
EB3
I140 Mailed Date
:
Chargeability
:
India
Processing Stage
:
I-140
I485 Mailed Date
:
Compare
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 589
satishku_2000 has a spectacular aura about satishku_2000 has a spectacular aura about satishku_2000 has a spectacular aura about
Default since PD

Quote:
Originally Posted by gneerajg View Post
I got a ref today the reason ability not to pay. They state that in line 21ordinary business income is less than what it should be according to PW and based on that employer was not able to PW in those years like from 2001 to 2006but the gross income was always in between 600000-1000000 each year. but can they relate your old returns with new PW. I mean does it matter based on your last 5 returns ability not to pay but currently I am drawing more than PW and my employer never filed tax`return with loss. pl. advice Does I need good CPA

40k+ in 2006
35k+ in 2005
33k+ in 2004

EB-3 PD 2001
Filed I-140 & I-485 on May 5,2007

The petitioner must show the ability to pay since establishment of PD. It does not matter if you get paid more than proferred now . Getting paid more than proferred wage always helps.

If the petitioner has more than one immigration petition pending then he has to prove that he has ability to pay for all petitions simultaneously since each petitions respective priority date.

Declaring profits help but again one has to put everything in context of immigration petition. If you got paid 10k less than proferred wage in a particualr year , petitioners profits must exceed 10k for that year. If there are 10 petitions pending in a year and all of them got paid 10k less than proferred wage petitioners profit must exceed 100k. I am trying to a put a simple example here . A right lawyer or right CPA may have ways to overcome these things.

Looks like a good sign in your case is you filed in May 2007 , is that regular or premium processing case? If it is reg processing case then looks like INS is processing cases based on PD which is a good thing should help lot of BEC folks.

Just curious if your case is a labor substution case?
Bookmark and Share Compare Reply With Quote


Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
All I140 questions and discussions here desibechara All other Green Card Issues 395 04-20-2016 11:34 PM
Laid off: All questions and discussions javaconsultant All other Green Card Issues 138 06-21-2013 09:40 AM
All I485/EAD/AP questions and discussions here godbless Receipt tracker of 485, EAD and AP applications 1329 05-05-2011 06:31 AM
All Labor substitution questions and discussions here neocor RFEs and specific queries 490 09-07-2007 12:27 PM
All questions and discussions here a_yaja Retrogression, priority dates and Visa bulletins 1 05-10-2007 03:41 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c)ImmigrationVoice.org